Tag Archives: VAERS

What are the real numbers?

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | December 26, 2021

As the COVID saga continues, it is undeniable the officially promulgated numbers are confused, conflicted and unreliable.  In the beginning, many of us took the official numbers at face value.  The media’s narrative was and is driven primarily by the number of ‘cases’ and sometimes misattributed deaths; yet few of us know the finer details behind these frightening headlines.  Seemingly, simple questions like: “What is a case?; What is a COVID death?;  What is COVID pneumonia?; What does it mean to test positive if you have no symptoms and how accurate are the PCR tests amplified at 40 cycles looking only at three small segments (RdRp, S & N) of a proposed virus in silico?” Answers to these questions remain elusive, nondeterministic and subject to interpretation and manipulation.

One would think a case is a confirmed COVID infection, but this is just not so.  We learn a case can be suspect, probable, or confirmed and even the confirmed cases cannot be confirmed with the formally gold standard test.  The definitions of case categories represent a long and winding road of updates and links to other definitions; all subject to change at the whim of the experts.   Add to this, long established definitions of key terms like vaccine, herd Immunity and pandemic have been quietly altered since COVID.

Note: with the advent of the COVID-19 project, the term vaccinated became ‘fully vaccinated’ and is now called ‘up to date’.  Add to this, if you have had two doses of the mRNA injections, you are considered  ‘unvaccinated’ until 14 days after your second dose; and even then you are faced with potentially unlimited booster shots every few months to maintain your up to date status; thus you are unvaccinated if you are not up to date.  These moving targets can add to the already hot mess found in the faulty data collection and analysis.

Yet, we constantly hear about the incredible number of cases, while few if any know what a case is.  What is a case? Ask any doctor, media pundit or health professional this question and you are likely to get a blank, confused stare.   They may think you are an idiot because everyone knows what a case is, but they don’t.

We are told the CDC’s own VAERS database –designed to track adverse events– is not accurate; we have collected this information every year since 1990 for what purpose if it is unreliable?

So what are the real numbers?  We will never know, but we can attempt to come up with a rough order of magnitude using the information we have to date.

Since March of 2020, I talked with many health professionals who had no idea what VAERS was; or, that they should be reporting these adverse events in the VAERS database. It takes time and effort to make even one entry, and many who know about VAERS just don’t take the time; so it is my personal opinion the adverse events are hugely underreported.  But what does the latest VAERS show us? See the so called ‘Harvard’ VAERS study below.  Be careful not to call it a ‘Harvard study’ lest you be attacked by a swarm of paid fact-checkers.

“It is worth pointing out that Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc., has no affiliation with Harvard University.  Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS)”  https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf

The Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study (sometimes called the Harvard study) does point us in the direction of under-reporting in VAERS by a factor of 100X; but even at 10X, these figures are breathtaking.  If these numbers are correct, we are looking at a mass genocide of historical proportions, while our trusted experts continue to pretend these injections are ‘safe & effective’.  This does not include any mid to long-term damage from this global experiment.  

The CDC’s VAERS shows there have been 983,756 reports of vaccine adverse events; 34,615 permanently disabled 3,365 Miscarriages, 10,429 heart attacks and 20,622 reported deaths through December 17, 2021. Source: https://openvaers.com/covid-data

These figures may not be accurate but a comparison of previous years, may be instructive since they dwarf all other records kept since 1990:

As of December 23, 2021 we are told the total number of COVID deaths is 808,957, yet we discover most of these deaths were unnecessary: “Of the COVID-19 deaths in the U.S., none received adequate and/or early-enough treatment. At least 85% of COVID deaths were preventable.”  Source: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-deaths-could-have-been-prevented/

This means 687,613 people were needlessly killed by withholding early treatment.

Additionally, we discover those who were unlucky enough to be admitted to the hospital after their lips turned blue, were given the deadly Remdesivir known to cause kidney failure which then causes their lungs to fill with fluid, so  the hospitals could put them on a vent to die.  This means the officially sanctioned protocol is killing most of the people, not the dreaded, scary COVID; yet the CDC and others get to report 808,957 died of COVID which is just not true.

So what are the real numbers?

To be generous, 121,343 may have died from COVID.  But the question remains: Of these 121,343 how many died with COVID and how many died from COVID?  How many died from some comorbidity or even as a result of an unrelated accident?  We will never know.

And what is a case?  There is no clear definition I can find.  The more I read about the definition of a case the more murky it becomes, but I’ll let you decide.

END

References & Additional Reading:

Alberta just inadvertently confessed to fiddling the COVID vaccination stats. More than half the newly vaccinated deaths were dumped in the unvaccinated. –Joel Smalley

All-Cause Mortality: COVID-19: FOLLOWING THE MONEY | The Highwire with Del Bigtree

Remdesivir with Dr. Bryan Ardis:

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/09/02/remdesivir-causes-renal-failure-hospital-protocols-are-killing-people/

Continue reading

David’s Stack of Stuff (Sunday May 22nd, 2021)

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | May 22nd, 2021

Where did  they go?

In a kinder, gentler era, my most favored pundits, news reporters, researchers and historians could be found in one place — YouTube; but since the purge, they scattered … some never to be seen again.   This has made my life more difficult, since I’ve had to spend a considerable amount of time tracking down these talented content creators.  To help keep track, I turned to my trusty old Excel spreadsheet where I am noting their destinations for quick and easy access.  I’ve also decided to give them an adaptive score based on how well they adapted to this coordinated attack by the big tech monopolies.   These deleted content creators were found guilty of ‘thoughtcrimes’ and spreading ‘wrong-think’ by big tech and so, were scattered to the wind; hopefully they will all find fresh air and sunshine to grow again and a fertile soil on which to re-hydrate their former fan-base. Of course their adaptive scores are mostly subjective based on my opinion.  Some –like James Corbett and Tim Kelly– were primed to make the jump; some like Ryan Dawson are still struggling to find their way; and some, have disappeared entirely from my view: Jason Goodman and Greg Hunter.  Those who have been allowed to remain and prosper — Limited hangout Tim Pool & sellout Ben Shapiro— should be viewed with at least a little suspicion: 1) Too small to be noticed? 2) A limited hangout?  3) Self-censored after strikes from these platform bullies? Or 4) serve some unknown purpose for the propagandists who are directing big tech’s shameless attack on free speech?

My spreadsheet (talent on the left, platforms on the top)

This shows all the columns, though are difficult or impossible to read at this resolution. Too many knew the purge was coming, but hoped beyond hope they might be spared, but none were. Most were not prepared.

Continue reading