Tag Archives: Darwin

‘Scientific study backs intelligent design’ ?

Leave a reply

charles-robert-darwin-62911_640

Good informative article below entitled ‘Scientific study backs intelligent design’ but I have a few comments.   First, I would not have used the term ‘Intelligent Design’. Why? Because there is no clear definition for this term.  It means different things to different people and it is so divisive it causes many to disengage.   What we can say is that Darwinian-style Evolution is a theory not a fact.  I have been preaching this for years to my kids teachers who try to fill their heads with this fuzzy thinking.  Are there natural and other types of selection for a better genotype? Yes. We have the ‘Delicious Apple’, the ‘Hereford cattle’, and all the different breeds of dogs, cats, etc. so yes there is a mechanism for genetic change and stabilization both natural and assisted by man. But how do you get from a primordial soup to an amoeba or from an amoeba to a horse; and why don’t our evolutionists tell us that Dr. Leakey’s missing link called Lucy wasn’t a missing link after all?  Why is it that sharks or lampreys haven’t changed one gene in millions of years?  What about the Pre-Cambrian Explosion of Life forms in the Geologic time scale?  No one has adequately answered that question!  Why does man build spaceships, computers and massive skyscrapers while the ants build dirt mounds?  These are important questions that the myth of “Settled Science” omits from the domain of logical discussion.

“Cause-and-effect physical determinism…cannot account for the programming of sequence-dependent biofunction.’”

‘Scientific study backs intelligent design’

Some additional thoughts …

We are told that Chimps and Man share 96 – 99% of the same genes, but they neglect to tell us that man also shares 55% of the same genes with a banana. So what are we to conclude from this? First that the dogma of “Settled Science” attempts to stop any questioning or logical discussion of their sacred dogma as with the Global Warming hoax.

Secondly I think we can conclude that if chimps and man share 99% of the same genes, we may have over emphasized the determinative importance of adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine as the DNA bases.

So our vaulted scientists tell us that Darwin’s theory of evolution is a fact not a theory and in their hubris they talk about the Universe as if they know what this is when they should use the modifier ‘KNOWN’ universe.

Our scientists –while a very useful tool– don’t even know what gravity is or the cause of –as Einstein called it “Spooky Motion at a Distance”– or quantum entanglement

More information:

David Berlinski Explains Problems With Evolution.

 

Do you see a pattern here?

2 Replies

martinique-206916_640

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | JUNE 12, 2011

Do you see a pattern here? Believing in the primacy of the state over the individual is a religion in every sense of the word yet spreads undetected into all aspects of our lives. Although Darwin himself was not an atheist, the Darwinian Theory is based on the materialism that man is just a soulless animal or a series of chemical reactions; a cog in a wheel, and thus merely an effect –not cause over effect– converges with the godless belief system in the state over the individual. This epistemology is devoid of any real morality and produces a barren moonscape robbed of meaning or the juice of life. This epistemology contains no external standards which cannot be modified whimsically to fit the fashions or the politics of the day. Their standard is not a standard at all. Not believing in the individual, freewill or individual personal responsibility, the progressive Democrats –which are in fact authoritarians– regularly check themselves into rehab after engaging in socially unacceptable behavior thus taking no real responsibility for their actions as individuals. It is always someone else’s fault. It’s a mental illness, It’s their childhood, it’s big business, it’s society’s fault, its poverty, it’s mom or dad…it’s fill in the blank with anything but the person actually responsible. All they require is some counseling, group therapy, new religion or a magic pill and they will be all better. This aberration in identifying the real culprit frustrates any attempt to take responsibility; break away from the old ways that did not work and to make meaningful changes so that the individual can grow into new healthy and prosperous ways of living. True healing and corrective action can only come after the total destruction of the old faulty assumptions, the old habits and the old ways of thinking that did not work so that a rebuilding of healthy habits that do work can take place on new ground thus provided.