Banned Again From Facebook

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | May 03, 2020

Banned again from Facebook.  What was my crime?  I posted a picture of Taylor Swift –fully clothed—giving what appears to be a Sieg Heil salute.  I posted no comment either for or against this picture.   Now, I’m no fan of the vacuous Taylor Swift; and I’m certainly no Nazi. I have no idea of the context of this picture, but I thought the picture was amusing if not noteworthy and completely unaware this would violate Facebook’s amorphous ‘Community Standards’ flamethrower; requiring a Facebook jail term of 90 days (later reduced to 30).  The Facebook censors seem to have a particular aversion to all things Hitleresque even if from their darling Taylor Swift.

So Facebook said they were going to ban me 90 Days for posting this picture of Taylor Swift, but only banned me for 30 Days and then they said they were mistaken and lifted the ban.  But then they decided not to lift the ban, yet allowed the offending picture back on my wall.  I am still banned.  After I protested in vein, they said ‘Case Closed’ and went on about their business.  In any event, it is fully within Facebook’s power to cut me off or delete anything they want despite being founded with the help of a US Government agency paid for with my tax money.  Sweet.  I get to pay for my own abuse.

It is noteworthy to mention one of my prior Facebook infractions –which was promptly removed by Facebook– was the famous picture of Hitler (“A dangerous individual”) standing in front of the Eifel Tower in Paris, overlaid on top of a modern picture of the same spot.   I think this is really cool to juxtapose the then and the now to give a historical sense of this very spot.  Again, I supplied no comments pro or con, yet this picture was removed.  I was also banned for posting a picture of Eric Ciaramella; commonly known in Washington, DC as Adam Schiff’s personal CIA Spy a.k.a. what the media termed ‘The Whistle-Blower’.  Obviously, Facebook was trying to protect Adam Schiff’s phony-baloney impeachment effort from the curative power of sunlight.

Previous to this, I was banned for expressing my opinion abortion is in fact murder and not merely a medical procedure like having a tooth removed.  You can always count on Facebook to support the officially promulgated narrative on any topic.  It is obvious to me Facebook is tied at the hip to all the other actors engaged in the art of public deception by the speed and coordination they decide what shall be censored and what shall not. Apparently the MSM are tightly coordinated with FB, YouTube and Twitter on whatever bogus narrative is being pushed at the time.  It would be interesting to find out who is at the top of these corporations, controlling the strings of these thought-shapers.

From elementary school onward, my silly head was filled with independent ideas that might or might not harmonize with the well-established fact-claims of the establishment; or those in power over me.   I was skeptical of puffed-up stories lacking demonstrated evidence or benefit. However, many if not most, of my fellow classmates took the other approach buying into, or at a minimum, complying with the  authoritative group-think on sale at our local compulsory public school systems.    Which brings me right back to Facebook and its unending manipulation of its users.  Over the years, I’ve tolerated Facebook’s constant removal and blocking of my posts and of their knee-jerk reaction to ban me for 30 days or longer for reasons only Dolores Umbridge could love.   I cannot agree with any of their actions, not a single one.

Dolores Umbridge:  a Facebook role model?

Facebook is an absurdity; a nuisance; a gnat buzzing around my food while I try to eat in peace; or concentrate on the task at hand… always there to follow me like a shadow, and always to make sure I am thinking correctly, behaving correctly or saying the right words — they are to be tolerated until they are no longer tolerable.

I wonder how many users subject to Facebook’s constant prodding and pushing comply just to get along?

All this makes sense when we consider  Facebook’s roots.  Birthed in the bowels of the secret state through DARPA as LifeLog and paid for by American taxpayers.  Like many of our other oppressors, Facebook has an agenda; and the agenda –like the head-shot of JFK or knocking down those buildings on 9/11; or the many other crimes their soul brothers have committed — is to promulgate an official narrative in support of those they serve.   Facebook is the villain violating free speech, not me; and Facebook is burning non-conforming ideas as the Nazi’s burned books in their day.  I am hopeful therefore Facebook and their goons will soon face a similar ending.

While I’m banned on Facebook, you can find me on Twitter at @BoDogBrown or on WeGo at https://wego.social/clearnfo under David Brown.

Be the best,

David

Earlier posts on this topic:

On the matter of William Thomas Stead …

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | February 16, 2020

It is interesting to note Alfred Milner was one of the most –if not the most– powerful men on planet earth from the 1890s to the 1920s; and Stead was part of the Milner-Rhodes inner circle for a time.

While reading  ‘Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War’ by Gerry Docherty and Jim MacGregor, I discovered some interesting information on one of the main characters in Quigley’s Anglo-American Establishment. This person’s name is William Thomas Stead or W.T. Stead.

Stead was part of the Rhodes hidden circle of elites, who personally investigated and wrote four stories about child prostitution in his Pall Mall Gazette – this was an effort to pass the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1885, to increase the age of consent from 13 to 16.  After the Titanic hit an iceberg, survivor Philip Mock, saw Stead clinging to a raft with John Jacob Astor IV. “Their feet became frozen”, reported Mock, “and they were compelled to release their hold. Both were drowned.”

Stead meets Cecil Rhodes

From The Origins of the Deep State in North America by Matthew Ehret in The Duran (04 May 2019):  Stead was officially recruited to the  [Anglo-American Establishment‘s] grand design in 1889 which was instigated by Rhodes and his sponsor Lord Rothschild. It was when Stead had been recently released from prison due to his Gazette’s promotion of “organized vice” only to find his paper in serious financial trouble, when he was first called upon by Cecil Rhodes, a long time follower of his journal in South Africa. After their first meeting, Stead ecstatically wrote to his wife:

“Mr. Rhodes is my man! I have just had three hours talk with him. He is full of a far more gorgeous idea in connection with the paper than even I have had. I cannot tell you his scheme because it is too secret. But it involves millions. He had no idea that it would cost £250,000 to start a paper. But he offered me down as a free gift £20,000 to buy a share in the P.M. Gazette as a beginning… His ideas are federation, expansion, and consolidation of the Empire…. He took to me. Told me some things he has told no other man—save Lord Rothschild— and pressed me to take the £20,000, not to have any return, to give no receipt, to simply take it and use it to give me a freer hand on the P.M.G. It seems all like a fairy dream….”

Stead Investigates Child Prostitution and gets three months in Prison

Not only was Stead part of what Quigley called the Network, the Milner Group or the Round Table, Mr. Stead was editor of the Pall Mall Gazette and credited with creating a “new journalism” which demonstrated how the press could be used to influence public opinion and government policy, and he advocated “Government by Journalism”.

To this end, he wrote a scandalous four-part piece on human trafficking and child prostitution in a successful effort to raise the age of consent from 13 to 16.  His writings were  based -of course- on his own personal investigative research which earned him a three-month prison sentence for purchasing 13 year-old Eliza Armstrong  from her alcoholic mother without obtaining the permission of her father.  Note: Both Stead’s writings and the details of the Eliza Armstrong case can be purchased on-line.

Wikipedia: In 1893–94 Stead lived in Chicago for six months, campaigning against brothels and drinking dens, and published If Christ Came to Chicago.

“Nineteenth Precinct, First Ward, Chicago”, 1894 – map by Stead presenting 37 brothels, 46 saloons, 11 pawnbrokers

The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon

I’ve included some quotes from Stead’s The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon – Child Prostitution and Victorian Journalism below.

From Wikipedia: William Thomas Stead – The Pall Mall Gazette in July 1885 …

The disclosure proper began in the July 6 publication, in which Stead reveals that he had asked if genuine maiden virgins could be procured, and being told it was so, asked whether such girls were willing and consensual, or aware of the intentions planned for them:

“But,” I continued, “are these maids willing or unwilling parties to the transaction–that is, are they really maiden, not merely in being each a virgo intacta in the physical sense, but as being chaste girls who are not consenting parties to their seduction?” He looked surprised at my question, and then replied emphatically: “Of course they are rarely willing, and as a rule they do not know what they are coming for.” “But,” I said in amazement, “then do you mean to tell me that in very truth actual rapes, in the legal sense of the word, are constantly being perpetrated in London on unwilling virgins, purveyed and procured to rich men at so much a head by keepers of brothels?” “Certainly,” said he, “there is not a doubt of it.” “Why,” I exclaimed, “the very thought is enough to raise hell.” “It is true,” he said; “and although it ought to raise hell, it does not even raise the neighbours.”

“But do the girls cry out?” “Of course they do. But what avails screaming in a quiet bedroom? Remember, the utmost limit of howling or excessively violent screaming, such as a man or woman would make if actual murder was being attempted, is only two minutes, and the limit of screaming of any kind is only five… But suppose the screams continue and you get uneasy, you begin to think whether you should not do something? Before you have made up your mind and got dressed the screams cease, and you think you were a fool for your pains… Once a girl gets into such a house she is almost helpless, and may be ravished with comparative safety”.

Stead commented that “Children of twelve and thirteen cannot offer any serious resistance. They only dimly comprehend what it all means. Their mothers sometimes consent to their seduction for the sake of the price paid by their seducer. The child goes to the introducing house as a sheep to the shambles. Once there, she is compelled to go through with it. No matter how brutal the man may be, she cannot escape”. A madam confirmed the story for him, stating of one girl that she was rendered unconscious beforehand, and then coercively given the choice to continue or be homeless afterwards:

“I engaged her to be my little maid at the lodgings where I was staying. The very next day I took her off with me to London and her mother never saw her again. What became of her? A gentleman paid me £13 for the first of her, soon after she came to town. She was asleep when he did it–sound asleep. To tell the truth, she was drugged. It is often done. I gave her a drowse. It is a mixture of laudanum and something else. Sometimes chloroform is used, but I always used either snuff or laudanum. We call it drowse or black draught, and they lie almost as if dead, and the girl never knows what has happened till morning. And then? Oh! then she cries a great deal from pain, but she is ‘mazed, and hardly knows what has happened except that she can hardly move from pain. Of course we tell her it is all right; all girls have to go through it some time, that she is through it now without knowing it, and that it is no use crying. It will never be undone for all the crying in the world. She must now do as the others do. She can live like a lady, do as she pleases, have the best of all that is going, and enjoy herself all day. If she objects, I scold her and tell her she has lost her character, no one will take her in; I will have to turn her out on the streets as a bad and ungrateful girl. The result is that in nine cases out of ten, or ninety-nine out of a hundred, the child, who is usually under fifteen, frightened and friendless, her head aching with the effect of the drowse and full of pain and horror, gives up all hope, and in a week she is one of the attractions of the house.”

Stead quoted a former brothel-keeper who confirmed the nature of the trade:

“Maids, as you call them – fresh girls as we know them in the trade – are constantly in request, and a keeper who knows his business has his eyes open in all directions, his stock of girls is constantly getting used up, and needs replenishing, and he has to be on the alert for likely “marks” to keep up the reputation of his house. I have been in my time a good deal about the country on these errands. The getting of fresh girls takes time, but it is simple and easy enough when, once you are in it. I have gone and courted girls in the country under all kinds of disguises, occasionally assuming the dress of a parson, and made them believe that I intended to marry them, and so got them in my power to please a good customer. How is it done? Why, after courting my girl for a time, I propose to bring her to London to see the sights. I bring her up, take her here and there, giving her plenty to eat and drink–especially drink. I take her to the theatre, and then I contrive it so that she loses her last train. By this time she is very tired, a little dazed with the drink and excitement, and very frightened at being left in town with no friends…”

“I offer her nice lodgings for the night: she goes to bed in my house, and then the affair is managed. My client gets his maid, I get my £10 or £20 commission, and in the morning the girl, who has lost her character, and dare not go home, in all probability will do as the others do, and become one of my “marks”–that is, she will make her living in the streets, to the advantage of my house. The brothel keeper’s profit is, first, the commission down for the price of a maid, and secondly, the continuous profit of the addition of a newly seduced, attractive girl to his establishment. That is a fair sample case of the way in which we recruit. Another very simple mode of supplying maids is by breeding them. Many women who are on the streets have female children. They are worth keeping. When they get to be twelve or thirteen they become merchantable. For a very likely “mark” of this kind you may get as much as £20 or £40…”

Additional reading:

A History Written by Victors

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 18, 2019

I’ve been steeped in the Jewish Holocaust of WWII most of my life. I’ve read many books on the topic and have visited Holocaust museums to observe the documented horror and show my respects. In high school, I read ‘Man’s Search for Meaning’ by Viktor Frankl (Holocaust survivor, surviving Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Kaufering and Türkheim). In his book, Viktor describes in gruesome detail his time in the Nazi concentration camps and how he managed to survive.  I credit this book with my own personal survival of a different holocaust some three decades later. My favorite 13-part British documentary ‘The Ascent of Man’ presented by British mathematician and historian and Polish-Jew Jacob Bronowski expressed profound and moving conclusions on the lessons of the Holocaust. I had Jewish rabbis as friends and neighbors, whom I’ve had long philosophical discussions with, helped repair fences (literally), move refrigerators, stayed in touch with over decades, eaten dinner with, watched their kids grow up, etc.

The Truth Fears No Questions

And I’ve watched all the historical documentaries you have depicting all the emaciated Jews behind barbed wire fences in Nazi concentration camps saved by the US Military. I’ve seen the stacks of shoes in piles next to the ovens at these same camps. And I heard of the lamp-shades made out of human skin, and I’ve heard that Hitler ordered the extermination of 6 million Jews and this was the Holocaust. And so today if you are really pissed at someone, you can call them Hitler which is the worst approved pejorative possible, since we all know it is a ‘well-established fact’ Hitler was a monster.

Despite all the above, I am no fool. After reading Quigley, Perloff and Sutton, I discover most of what I knew about WWII is just not true; and so, I wonder about the Holocaust too. Only problem, it is illegal to wonder about the Holocaust in 17 countries; and if you dare ask any questions here in the good old US of A –no matter how innocent– you are quickly labeled a ‘Holocaust denier’, attacked by the powerful ADL and may lose your job, your friends, your internet platform, etc. I must ask though, if this truth is so very true, why then must we enact laws to protect this fragile truth from critical scrutiny? I’m thinking the truth of the Holocaust might just be one of the biggest red pills ever.

What if the real monster was Winston Churchill? What if Churchill was a drunkard, gambler in debt up to his eyeballs to Rothschild; and what if Churchill delighted in firebombing 200,000 – 500,000 innocent men, women and children melting them into the pavement when there was zero military benefit for this mass murder. What if the gassing chambers were really to get rid of lice? What if the emaciated bodies were due to the Allied forces embargo? What if it were only 300 to 600,000 and not 6 million? What if FDR knew about the attack on Pearl Harbor prior to the attack and did nothing? What if Rockefeller’s Standard Oil was selling a special synthetic oil to Hitler (without which there would have been no war) while denying the same to our troops? And what if there were no lamp-shades made out of human skin?  And what if “History is written by the victors.”?

Additional reading:

World War II – A Necessary Re-Evaluation 

Sanctions Are War By Other Means by James Corbett (May 14, 2023)

 

Defrauding America

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 18, 2019

On this Memorial Day, the nation honors the 58,000 dead American soldiers killed in the CIA initiated and directed Vietnam War. The mass media says virtually nothing about the ugly side of that war, in which GI’s were cannon-fodder, and used to protect and escalate the drug trafficking into the United States.

Flag-draped coffins of eight American Servicemen killed in attacks on U.S. military installations in South Vietnam, on February 7, are placed in transport plane at Saigon, February 9, 1965, for return flight to the United States. Funeral services were held at the Saigon Airport with U.S. Ambassador Maxwell D. Taylor and Vietnamese officials attending. # AP

Even in the death GI’s were used by the CIA. An officer heading a group of investigators from the army’s Criminal Investigation Division uncovered a large-scale heroin smuggling scheme. The group filed reports with the Pentagon, describing how the bodies of the dead GI’s were gutted, and filled with sacks of heroin. Approximately fifty pounds of heroin with a multi-million dollar street value were stuffed into each body…Document’s accompanying the drug-filled corpses were coded so that people at Air Force Bases in the United States, including at Travis and Norton air-force bases, could remove the drugs upon arrival in California.

In typical fashion, the military hierarchy reacted to the report by disbanding the investigative team. Other reports plus those given to me by my CIA contacts, provide further confirmation of this sordid practice. This coverup made possible the continued drug smuggling and constituted criminal coverup.

Crates returning to the U.S from Vietnam on military aircraft often contained bags of heroin, and the coded labels false indicated the contents were military supplies. The coverup by the military, the CIA,and the Justice Department, were part of the overall epidemic.

These aspects of the CIA-initiated and directed Vietnam War, and the debauchery of American GI’s, were never addressed at Memorial Day ceremonies. Instead the American public was led to believe that the hundreds of thousands of dead, maimed, and injured Americans suffered for an honorable cause, protecting the United States.

Even the heads of veteran organization, including the Veteran Foreign Wars and the American Legion, withheld this information from their members.

This is not to discredit those brave men and women who were ordered into battle and who endured such terrible fear, injury and death. But the American public must wake up, to realize that the extreme losses in human life and dignity were a farce perpetrated upon them.

Rodney Stitch –
From his book, “Defrauding America”.

 

Additional reading: 

The CIA Drug Connection Is as Old as the Agency
By Larry Collins, International Herald Tribune
Dec. 3, 1993

ClearNFO:

On the matter of the Vietnam War…

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 17, 2019

Vietnam was an ugly, pointless war based on a US Government lie called the ‘Gulf of Tonkin Incident’. This undeclared war in Southeast Asia brutally slaughtered and maimed millions of innocent men, women and children, including our young American boys: 58,315 KIA; 153,303 WIA; 1,618 MIA; & 778 POWs. It changed this country forever; enriching only the defense contractors, the MIC and those who financed this war effort. Though many of my fellows in high school had been sent off to Vietnam –only to return in body bags– I was too young to go; but I watched the slaughter and the returning body bags on TV every night from the safety and comfort of my home. The Vietnam War brought us the anti-war movement, psychedelic drugs (aided and promoted by the CIA), eastern religions, free love, increased state domestic power and surveillance, huge debts owed to the central bankers and changed American culture forever.

Later, my college biology teacher told me he had served in Vietnam. He was a fit, small guy with a wily, dry sense of humor, and a pure white shock of hair jetting out of his hairline; and he was a good teacher. He served in the ground infantry and said he enjoyed his stay there so much he re-enlisted three times. I asked him what he learned in Vietnam and he said how to survive. Later when I was running my own business I hired several Vietnam veterans. Most would never speak a word about their time there, but two confided in me. One made me swear that I would never tell his wife he served in Vietnam since he had never told her. I found this to be very strange if not implausible. Another broke down and cried in my office for all the bad things he had done. He had even been ordered to kill US POWs since they represented a threat to the US negotiations. Another Vietnam veteran told me that all their ammo was locked up in a bunker and they couldn’t return fire, until they received approval from headquarters. My father-in-law also served in Vietnam, but never speaks of his time there.

Since WWII, the US has not declared one single war, yet since that time our war efforts have increased exponentially as well as our debt to those who finance these undeclared wars; and if we choose to look over the walled garden in which we live, we will discover that every single one of these wars are based on lies similar to the lie which brought us Vietnam. And so it goes.

Why does Facebook hate me?

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 15, 2019

I am not a violent person; I am not a criminal; I do not promote violence or hatred; I have never shared illegal or sexually explicit photos or paintings on my Facebook pages– ever.

So why does Facebook hate me so?

Or the question is: why have so many of my posts been banned from FB – the majority of which FB doesn’t even bother to list or show me – thus keeping me in the dark as to what my infraction was?  I am left only to guess.

Many years ago, in the beginning or my FB experience, I was permanently banned for my strong, anti-abortion postings. I wrote FB a letter and they changed the permanent ban to a 45-day ban.  From this, I became much more circumspect, sophisticated and clever in my anti-abortion posts which worked-well to avoid the Facebook censors.  From here, Facebook would delete various postings and pictures for reasons that are irrational as far as I can determine.  I’ve always thought of it as “Algorithms and/or AI gone wild.”  For example, they deleted a beautiful non-sexual classic renaissance oil painting I had hanging in my house since I was a child that depicted the side of a woman’s breast.   They deleted a picture of a pre-pubescent boy or girl (impossible to tell) in a canoe in the amazon jungle playing with a turtle — only the top of this child was bare.   Obviously the FB algorithms are looking for patches of bare skin — not knowing exactly what they are seeing.   I protested in every case and was denied in all but one.

My latest banning from Facebook occurred on 11/12/19 because as FB said I was “facilitate[ing] or coordinate[ing] crime activity likely to cause harm to people business or animals”.   What had I done that was so criminal? I posted a fully clothed picture of Adam Schiff’s CIA Spy also known as the whistle-blower Eric Ciaramella eating dinner.  I knew of several people who were banned for posting his name, so I made sure I did not post his name, just his photo.  BTW, I had several other photos on my FB page of Eric, but for some reason FB noticed this one and banned me for 30 days accusing me of being a criminal. Had they done this in public, I would have sued them for slander.

BTW: Adam Schiff previously released Eric’s unredacted name  in a deposition as did several other media outlets.

So it seems that I am not Facebook material.  FB just doesn’t want me on their site for some reason since they keep insulting me and damaging my enjoyment of their platform.

Though my tax dollars paid for their predecessor LifeLog (without which FB would have never existed), FB is now a private company and can therefore abuse my first (and 4th) amendment  rights at their will and pleasure for any reason whatsoever.    And of course the courts must determine at some point if Facebook is just a platform or if it is a publisher; or something entirely new.   Seems obvious to me that if Facebook is curating the content on their platform—and they are– they are indeed publishers.   Facebook prefers to be a platform when it is convenient to them to avoid the legal constraints of being a publisher, but clearly they are much more than a platform – In addition to abusing their users’ 1st and 4th Amendments, they also serve as an effective propaganda organ –as did the old media– for the established power structure which currently promotes the religion of globalism and all its belief systems…

The Globalists’ Creed:

  • Sustainability via UN Agenda 21, 2030 and beyond
  • Man-made global warming and carbon taxes
  • Abortion on demand for any reason at any age
  • One world governance by a singular government or power structure – preferably the existing power structure
  • All 51 to 71 gender flavors recognized by FB
  • Vaccines are safe and effective
  • Supporting and promoting the lies, obfuscation and disinformation of the Mainstream Media cabal.
  • No borders with unlimited and unregulated immigration
  • Anti-male; anti-family; anti-white; anti-Christian

The Building Blocks for their unworkable New World Order:

  1. Common Core (Control Education)
  2. UN Agenda-21 & 2030 (Control Private Property Rights)
  3. Affordable Care Act (Control Health Care)
  4. Federal Reserve (Control Money)
  5. The Patriot Act & the USA Freedom Act (Control Civil Liberties)
  6. Free Trade Agreements like TPP (Control the movement of goods, services and people)
  7. Strong Cities Network (SCN) (Global Police Force)
  8. Global Warming (Install a Global Tax of $100 trillion)
  9. CFR (Control of US Foreign Policy and Geopolitics)
  10. Vaccines (Population Control)
  11. Main Stream Media (Perception Control)
  12. Open Borders  (destroy the idea of the nation-state)
  13. NATO (destabilize targeted countries)
  14. Supreme Court (pack the Supreme Court; undermine the rule of law)
  15. Terrorism and proxy army support (ISIS, Al Qaeda, Daesh, Al-Nusra Front, Wahhabism, etc.)

Other relevant links on this site 

 

On the matter of man, woman and the family

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 12, 2019

It’s been my observation that women are at the heart of our culture and civilization. Women magically transform a house into a home and sit at the seat of a healthy, happy family –which is a fundamental building block of what I consider society. So from my perspective, where the women goes; so goes society.

Now in the patriarchal society of Western Christendom, there have been many abuses against women which our modern societies have attempted to correct. From my perspective, this attempted correction has been an abysmal failure on many counts but not all. In our rush for egalitarian perfection, we have ignored the fundamental physical, mental and emotional differences between male and female; and many have wondered why we should value the physically stronger male at all.

Not too long ago, man’s successful interface with the world depended on the physical as much –or more– than the intellectual; and so, it was up to the physically stronger male to offer safety and protection to the physically weaker female. For this arrangement, there was a contract: the contract said that if the male would protect the female, the female would build a home and provide children for the home. In today’s technical society, we still need the physical strength of the male for certain tasks, but this value proposition has been greatly depreciated.

So on the road to correct our patriarchal abuses, we have gained some parity in terms of self-determination for the female, but we have lost much in terms of our fundamental building block of society we call the family. We have lost a fundamental respect for the position the matriarch holds in building a strong, happy and healthy family. We have thrown her out into the streets to fend for herself and we have turned her into an object of sex for sex’s sake only. Innocence and virtue no longer have lasting value, but to be consumed on demand; and to be degraded. Her fertile womb from which the family springs has been turned into a death chamber for our next generation. Our naive and short-sighted rush for equality convinced us infanticide is a reasonable choice for family planning.

We have lost our wholesomeness, our innocence and our commitment to the idea of one man, one woman and one family.

We have shirked our responsibility; we fail to take ownership of our actions, and so we are turned over to our own devices and avarice.

Like cackling hyenas over a recent kill, we feast at the hoax sold to us as sexual freedom and equality, we choose death over life, debauchery over love and are left howling into the vast existential abyss of meaninglessness — without our families.

Google is Politic; and Google is YouTube.

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 12, 2019

Since the election of Trump, YouTube has been busy destroying the financial viability of many platforms using their services with which they disagree. All the myriad of actions have one thing in common, they reduce the money flow and eyeballs attracted by these independent platforms. This reduction in ad revenue reduces revenue not only to these independent content producers but to YouTube itself. Starting on December 10th of this year, YouTube’s new TOS will allow YouTube to completely delete any YouTube channel that it deems not financially viable. So what you have here is:

1) YouTube targeted a select set of independent content producers;
2) reduced their ability to generate income for both YouTube and the content producer;
3) and now they will be deleting these content producers because they are not financially viable.

Why would any business do something this boneheaded? Because they are not really a business in the normal sense of the word. They are a controlled adjunct of the US Federal Government’s deep state. Born of your tax dollars and used against the good US Citizens who paid the bill.

YouTube has been a subsidiary of Google since November of 2006 and of course Google was the result of a DARPA project with Stanford University in 1998.

Wikipedia: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is an agency of the United States Department of Defense responsible for the development of emerging technologies for use by the military.

Blocked by Facebook — Again

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 12, 2019

Memo to Facebook: How could a photo of a grown man –fully clothed– eating dinner as you term it: “facilitate or coordinate crime activity likely to cause harm to people business or animals”?

The picture above is of Adam Schiff’s CIA Spy a.k.a. ‘The Whistle-Blower’ who shall remain nameless.

On the matter of Treason

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | June 30, 2019

Most people have a sense of what treason is, but this is based in common law, which does not apply here in the USA for treason. Why? Because most of the founders of this country were guilty of treason against King George III under common law, so they put in a special restrictive definition of treason in the US Constitution under Article Three. What this means is that it is almost impossible to convict anyone of treason in the USA: See the Opinion of Chief Justice Marshall (August 1807) Key arguments in the Burr trial.

Section 3 defines treason and its punishment. (‘Only’ and ‘levying’ are two key words here.)

Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.