1) First off, he is fully aware of the game going on around him, but pretends he has no clue 2) This gives his adversaries a false sense of confidence and perceived advantage 3) He then trolls these adversaries shifting them up a notch emotionally 4) He also drops ambiguous clues only an insider would have, creating uncertainty and low level panic in his heretofore confident adversaries 5) This ramps up the emotions another notch 6) In this confused and emotional state, his adversaries make a hasty move making easy to discover mistakes in the process 7) Trump points nonchalantly to their easily discoverable and easy to understand error and lets others expose his adversaries’ villainy 8) Benefit: Trump advances one square, letting others finish off what he has teed up.
We now have documented evidence that the Civil War, Spanish-American War, WWI, the Bolshevik Revolution, WWII, the Korean War and the War in Vietnam were all based on lies and fraud orchestrated and managed by people whose names few would recognize … and so the history we thought we knew is just not so.
There are many important books –and of course I would never claim I know them all– but a few major works provided me a peek over the walled garden in which I lived most of my life. These represent a few milestones in my journey to better understand the world into which I was born and provided me actual facts that cut deeply against the mythology promulgated 24X7 from womb to tomb by the propaganda organs of our existing power structure. Unfortunately these propaganda organs include our public schools, our news and entertainment media, our universities, tax-exempt foundations and our government. Most believe these myths and so repeat them. These common myths have now become the bedrock of our general understanding and collective agreement of how the world works. In short, these myths have become our generally accepted and agreed-to reality. A reality based not in fact but in deception, fraud, obfuscation and lies. So who would do such a thing? And how could so few men keep this information hidden for so long? Surely someone would have discovered these facts and told the world, right? Well they did tell the world but few have the time or interest to pay attention while the generally promulgated myths have their many benefactors.
So what to do? Spread knowledge based on sourced, documented fact.
Most people don’t have time, energy or interest to read Quigley’s academic 1,348 page ‘Tragedy and Hope’ or his 354 page ‘Anglo-American Establishment’ or the many other books by Sutton, Griffin, Perloff, etc.… to get their own front row seat to the workings of real power on the world stage, and so are denied their real history or an understanding of how it was managed.
Recognizing the problem of the large size and difficulty of these great books, Joseph Plummer invested many years of his life distilling these great works into two small easily approachable books: ‘Tragedy & Hope 101’ and ‘Dishonest Money’ which are now available to anyone.
For my part, I offered to give Plummer’s two books away for free (including the S&H) to any who would promise to read them. I am proud to say, I have given away 11 sets of these excellent books. I’m planting good, clean, healthy, honest seeds which may take years to germinate, but am hoping this butterfly wing flapping in the wind of this small town in Texas will become a tsunami washing away some of the evil which has enslaved the minds of so many; replacing false data with real data.
Additional reading:
Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time by Carroll Quigley Hardcover: 1348 pages
Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley Paperback: 354 pages
Federal Reserve: ‘Creature from Jekyll Island’ Paperback by G. Edward Griffin 608 pages
Tragedy and Hope 101: The Illusion of Justice, Freedom, and Democracy Paperback – April 24, 2014 by Joseph Plummer, G. Edward Griffin (Introduction) Paperback: 224 pages
Dishonest Money: Financing the Road to Ruin Paperback – December 19, 2008 by Joseph Plummer Paperback: 184 pages
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution: The Remarkable True Story of the American Capitalists Who Financed the Russian Communists by Anthony C. Sutton (Jan 1, 2012)
Wall Street and FDR Hardcover March 1, 2007 by Antony C. Sutton
Wall Street & the Rise of Hitler Paperback – June, 1976 by Antony C. Sutton
The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline by James Perloff
({RED PILL}): The Globalist plan for global conquest was as so… to fit regional pieces into a global super-structure: The EU (28 countries) was to fit into NAFTA (3 countries) using TTIP as the connector, then the TPP (12 -18 countries) was to be used to connect the EU, NAFTA and TTIP to the Pacific Rim countries. This global structure –once completed– was to be further homogenized using UN-Agenda 21 (now 2030 Agenda). To fund the governance of such a massive system, a global tax was required: Carbon Taxes, which could be used as a tax and a ‘justifiable’ control mechanism for every single human on the planet. The final goal is a scientific dictatorship, they call a ‘Technocracy’ to protect mother earth through population reduction. This is not about orange hair, small hands, left or right, male or female or Islam. Islam is being used as a tool by the globalists: out of chaos comes order, a new order controlled by the money masters, who are the natural predators of man. The death of TPP, the Brexit and the populism of Marine Le Pen (even if she loses), has set this global plan back decades. Russia and Putin are being used as the ‘big bad wolf’ to scare their livestock (that’s you) back into the pen. While you are at work, paying your bills and your taxes and raising your family, this is the kind of shit these folks are thinking up. Stop being their fool. Now.
“I think that the Trump presidency is already over. I’m not even sure he qualifies as a figurehead.”—PCR
Dr. Julian Charles:“We are joined once again by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, former US Assistant Secretary to the Treasury for Economic Policy, for a discussion on the Trump presidency so far.”
Dr. Roberts assesses the performance of the new president and his administration with reference to pre-election promises; shares with us his view that the deep state has effectively neutralised Donald Trump as US president; gives his reaction to the so-called “Syrian gas attack” in Idlib, and the subsequent military action by the US against Syria; and considers the very real prospects for war as Washington steps up its warmongering around the globe.
James Perloff on Trump, Syria and the New World Order
Published on May 25, 2017
James Perloff returns to Our Interesting Times to his article “Trump Is Unmasked: 14 Reasons Why the Syria Airstrikes Were a Really Bad Idea.” We talk about President Trump’s decision to order a missile attack on a Syrian airfield last month and why this apparent betrayal is a signal that his administration has been co-opted by neoconservative warmongers and the Israeli lobby. Later we discuss Trump’s alleged ties to Russia, his connections to the Deep State and organized crime.
Is Trump losing the Neocon chess game or is he just sacrificing some pawns to ready for a future attack?
Neocon Chess …
-Flynn Resigns as National Security Adviser
-Bannon removed from National Security Council
-Nunes steps aside from Russia investigation
-Trump attacks Syria
Trump just lobbed 59 Tomahawk missiles ($1.6M ea.) at a country that does not threaten the US and without a declaration of war as required by the US Constitution. Keep in mind that Assad has done nothing to the USA and does not threaten our national security in the least. Also, keep in mind, the first sarin gas attack the West blamed on Assad turned out to be supplied by Hillary. Does it matter the so-called (US-backed) ‘rebels’ have slaughtered 100s of thousands of innocent Syrians, most of whom were Christians? Does it matter that only Putin and Assad (not US/NATO) are protecting the Christians in Syria?
THIS IS WHAT A TOMAHAWK CRUISE MISSILE DOES
Saudi Arabia and Qatar didn’t want Iran and Syria to build a proposed pipeline between Iran and Syria which would have been competition to the House of Saud and Qatar (Our best head-chopping buds for life). The House of Saud didn’t like Syria’s Assad because he is Alawite not Sunni like them. Most of Syria (64%) is Sunni. Interesting note: Muslims, Jews and Christians have lived and worked in relative peace together in Syria for 200 years. Also, it is important to note that the US Geopolitical strategy was to destabilize the Middle East which included Syria so the Saudi and US State Department are in complete agreement that Assad must to go.
Dueling Pipelines
DRUDGE headlines from 4/6/17…
RAND PAUL: MUST COME TO CONGRESS FOR WAR APPROVAL…
TRUMP SPEED INTENDED TO MAXIMIZE ELEMENT OF SURPRISE…
CALLS ON ‘CIVILIZED NATIONS’ TO JOIN IN ‘SEEKING TO END THE SLAUGHTER AND BLOODSHED IN SYRIA’…
‘VITAL NATIONAL SECURITY INTEREST’ OF USA…
‘Targeted Military Strike’ on Airfield…
In Response to Chemical Attack…
Missiles Launched from Warships in Mediterranean…
RUSSIA WARNS USA…
Pentagon Confident ‘No Russian Forces At Air Field’…
TRUMP: August 30, 2013…
HILLARY: April 6, 2017…
Trump losing his base …
Update April 11, 2017: from the Saker…
A multi-level analysis of the US cruise missile attack on Syria and its consequences
On the matter of FAKE news. After the painful and unexpected loss of their rigged 2016 presidential election, our overlords have come up with a new method to constrain the alternative news using their newly minted Ministry of Truth; so I thought now would be a good time to find out how to determine what is fake and what is not.
There are many kinds of fake news sites. On one end of the spectrum, you have news satire siteslike The Onion or the Babylon Bee that make no bones about what they are up to. They blatantly make outlandish claims like the US will be painting the White House pink. This pink story even fooled the official Chinese news service who embarrassingly repeated this fake, but very funny story. This was a painful lesson for our authoritarian Chinese friends, but a lesson none the less they have yet to learn. They continue to be fooled. I read the Onion for fun, but never, ever post the Onion articles to my FB page, since many will share and re-post as fact.
Another kind of fake news site is one that does not source any of their fact-claims, they just make statements of opinion and present them as fact. They may be true or not, but can never be trusted. Usually just click-bait to satisfy your own prejudices: think confirmation bias.
Other sites are run or financed by the CIA for a myriad of reasons. One of their favorite tricks is to place something in the news that will later prove to be false. The fake news item is repeated by all those in the alt media who do no fact checking or sourcing, thus making the alt news folks look stupid… and many are. It’s a fun game.
Another CIA game is the limited hangout. The CIA uses this technique when they have been caught with their pants down. They will release just enough true information to give credibility but try to steer the public around the real data –or unanswered questions– hidden within. This is my opinion on Edward Snowden, Glenn Greenwald and The Intercept. Why? Check my articles at ClearNFO: search for Snowden. (The Intercept, somehow escaped inclusion in The FAKE 200; heavy /S)
I’ve divided the News into the following four (4) Categories:
1. FAKE but fun
2. FAKE with malice and forethought
3. FAKE without malice or forethought
4. REAL news sites
***NEWS Categories***
-FOR FUN
• News satire sites like ‘The Onion’
• I’ve listed others at the bottom of this article.
-WITH MALICE & FORETHOUGHT (Key Indicators: Heavy use of logical fallacies, omission of key data, concentrated ownership, interlocking board of directors and ties to big business and big government )
• MSM: ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, NYT, Washington Post, etc.
• The Economist
• WSJ
• Wikipedia yes, our beloved Wikipedia … sad but true.
• CIA PSYOPS
— Working with the MSM to shape public opinions (see Operation Mockingbird)
— Setting up fake news sites to help paint public landscape
— Releasing plausible but fake stories to embarrass those who repeat without verifying
— Limited Hangouts: Example ‘The Intercept’. Characteristics: well-funded and CIA connections. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting — sometimes even volunteering — some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.
-WITHOUT MALICE OR FORETHOUGHT:
• Blinded by ideology
• Blinded by the desire to please their financial supporters
• Lazy, ignorant
-REAL NEWS SITES:
• Good: James Corbett of The Corbett Report (See my links tab at ClearNFO for more good sites)
• Bad:CFR. The CFR is one of the major sources of evil on this planet, but they are generally very truthful about what their plans are. You may have to read between the lines a bit and it helps if you understand their origin and their plans for a one world government. A good place to start is with James Perloff’s excellent book, The Shadows of Power or with The Quigley Formula video on YouTube by G. Edward Griffin.
WHAT TO LOOK FOR: • Where does their money come from?
• Who is on their board of directors?
• Who are the owners?
• Do they site sources? (quoting anonymous sources with no evidence is a sure tip-off)
• Do they date their news articles?
• Do they EXAGGERATE their headlines?
• Does their headline match the content?
• Is the site geared for click-bait?
• Reputation? Good, bad or none?
Notable news satire outlets
Academia Caţavencu (Romania)
The Beaverton (Canada)
The Betoota Advocate (Australia)
Broken Newz
The Chaser (Australia)
The Civilian (New Zealand)
The Noose (Singapore)
The Clinic (Chile)
The Daily Currant (U.S.)
The Daily Mash (UK)
Disassociated Press
“El Mundo Today” (Spain)
El Jueves (Spain)
Faking News (India)
Feral Tribune (Croatia)
Frank (Canada)
Le Gorafi (France)
Grönköpings Veckoblad (Sweden)
Lush For Life (U.S.), abandoned 2007
Moskovskaya Komsomolka (Russia)
National Report (U.S.)
NewsBiscuit (UK)
The Onion (U.S.)
The Oxymoron (UK)
The Pan Arabia Enquirer (Middle East)
The Phoenix (Ireland)
Private Eye (UK)
SatireWire (U.S.)
ScrappleFace (U.S.)
Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (U.S.)
The Late Show with Stephen Colbert (U.S.)
Titanic (Germany)
The True North Times (Canada)
Uncyclopedia’s UnNews
The UnReal Times (India)
Weekend Update from Saturday Night Live (U.S.)
Weekly World News (U.S.)
Zaytung (Turkey)
If the news site contains the following domain names, it is likely a purveyor of fake news:
The Smith–Mundt Act of 1948banned the US Government from producing propaganda aimed at US Citizens. On July 2, that came silently to an end with the implementation of a new reform passed in January. The result: an unleashing of thousands of hours per week of government-funded radio and TV programs for domestic U.S. consumption in a reform initially criticized as a green light for U.S. domestic propaganda efforts.
Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 (part of the National Defense Authorization Act) has repealed the domestic prohibition, allowing the government’s broadcasting to be directed at/created for Americans for the first time in over 40 years. Jul 15, 2013
BBG (Broadcasting Board of Governors): The mission of the Broadcasting Board of Governors is to inform, engage, and connect people around the world in support of freedom and democracy. The agency’s mission is reinforced by those of the individual broadcasters that are overseen by the BBG.
The 25 Rules of Disinformation | May 24, 2011 From Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation (Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist) by H. Michael Sweeney. These 25 rules are everywhere in media, from political debates, to television shows, to comments on a blog.
My college philosophy teacher was and probably still is an atheist, yet he was an amazingly brilliant teacher … one of my best. Despite his lack of faith or belief in things unseen or unproven by his deductive method, he was staunchly anti-abortion. He reasoned as did I that once you minimize or devalue life at one end of the spectrum (very young) what logically will prevent you from minimizing it at the other end (very old); and once so done, one’s foot is squarely placed on the proverbial slippery slope. And where does this slope lead? Well it leads to further adjustments at either or both ends. So if we have scarce resources —which we always do– the value of a person prior to being productive for society would be less than say a person of working age and likewise the value of an older person incapable of vigorous work would be less valuable. So at some point, this logic trip leads us to the conclusion of stratification of value based on age; such that a society would be more interested in investing and/or saving the life of someone between the age of 18 and 35 say. Outside this range, you are less valuable and therefore on your own; or possibly a candidate for post-birth abortion. In fact this is already occurring. We have death panels with Obamacare and recent opinion polls on college campuses show a growing approval of post-birth abortion up to age five if it would save jobs. So there you have it. Ideas have power and they have consequences that on first blush you may not have even considered.
If you are religious, you can find many persuasive arguments against abortion from the pulpit; but if you are not religious, these arguments are unimpressive, unconvincing and annoying. If you believe that there is no creator, and that we are just the end result of eons of random successful genetic mutations originating from a primordial soup, the idea of a fetus being just a blob of cells like your liver or spleen– to be removed at will when necessary or convenient– is intellectually reasonable if not entirely emotionally satisfying. The non-religious would naturally wonder what the big fuss is all about and rightfully feel these religious nuts are encroaching on “my reproductive rights!” Amazingly, however, faith has found a place in the hearts of the faithless…once the fetus is beyond the birth canal, umbilical cord cut and fetus viable; it somehow magically attains full rights of an individual human being and is so named. This is part of a long list of “well-established” facts that comprise the credo of the secular world. They reason that perhaps life may begin a bit earlier than this, but not by much. To make things more confusing, we are told that no one really knows when life begins anyway; so we can now use this fuzzy construct to smudge any clear demarcation and add confusion to the ill-trained mind.
What kind of barbarian would deny a woman the right to control her own body or her right to practice birth control as she sees fit? And what about rape, incest and the mother’s life or the quality of life of the infant due to poverty, genetic irregularities, malformations or congenital maladies? Or you wanted a boy and not a girl or it’s just not convenient just now. Surely you must see the logic of allowing women to abort their fetuses? And, to combat the religious nuts, there are websites dedicated to proving that abortion is biblical just in case you are not so sure about all this Deity stuff. So what’s the big deal? The non-believer has every angle covered. It’s just a medical procedure performed by a doctor and his patient.
So, if we are to make any headway on this debate, we have two choices: we can convert everyone on the planet to agree with our particular religious views—unlikely– or we can take a logical, scientific view upon which believers and non-believers can agree.
So what is a fetus? Is it a blob of cells? Yes and no. Is it a weed or a flower, trash or treasure? A series of electrochemical reactions or a blessing? I think we can agree that the term fetus is a cold, disinterested name given to a very young human. It is not a dog. It is not a cat and it is not a liver or an abscessed tooth to be pulled or a hair or finger nail to be cut. It is something different. It depends on the mother for sustenance but it is not part of the mother and does not share its DNA with any other cell in the mother’s body. Every cell in the Mother’s body has the same DNA as every other cell in the Mother’s body except the fetus or baby which resides within the mother’s womb…there by no fault of its own. Helpless, nature’s most vulnerable. The baby possesses some DNA from the Father and some from the Mother but woven together in a very unique way. No two siblings are exactly alike even identical twins differ in terms of gene expression and space and time…and none possess the same combination of DNA as the Mother.
So I think we can safely say that the fetus is not part of the Mother’s body in any logical since unless you also consider the male’s penis part of the mother’s body during coitus and could be aborted as well if not attached to a legally defined separate human. But such conclusions illustrate the foolishness of the abortionists logic more than my crassness. And we can safely say that the fetus is a young human though we may disagree if it is alive or not. Since we have no good definition of life this can be problematic. Some viruses defy our definition of life by many accounts; however, most of us can tell the difference between a virus and a rock yet we get confused when discussing a fetus.
For the non-believer none of this may matter much anyway since the pain to the little human is short –if at all– and it benefits the greater good of the collective to reduce the population, but you must admit that this is a little more consequential than getting a tooth removed or a haircut and there may be some ethical question about killing an innocent life. And for the agnostic or the ethically challenged… if perchance there is a Creator, I would imagine this creator might be just a little bit pissed at a people who chose of their own free will to pass a law that has resulted in the death of over 58 million of His most innocent ones.
Posted byDAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | May 15, 2016
Below, you will find an outstanding two-part interview of Steve Outtrim by Jan Irvin of Gnostic Media chocked full of important information on the Burners and much, much more. This is well worth your time. If you have any spare funds, please consider a donation to Jan Irvin at Gnostic Media to help sustain Jan’s excellent work on these and other topics.
I really get why many people like Ted Cruz. They believe that he is a strict constitutionalist and that he will stand up to the establishment. He did after all take over the Senate floor for more than 21 hours to speak about the need to defund Obamacare, when other Republicans like John Cornyn voted to fully fund Obamacare with a cloture vote out of sight of their constituents. We all loved Ted for this bold move and we thought that we finally had someone to speak our voice, but what we didn’t fully appreciate is that other professional politicians saw this rightfully as grandstanding signifying nothing but self-serving promotional theater. As we dig deeper into Ted’s words vs his actions we discover that much of what Ted does is self-promotion, the facts and the constitution be damned.
Natural Born Citizen
First, it is abundantly clear to any strict interpretation of the constitution that Ted is not and cannot be a natural born citizen. Sure, you can point to this or that constitutional scholar or opinion maker who can make a reasoned argument that he is natural-born by their interpretation. I can point to just as many on the other side, but it is abundantly clear that Ted was born in Canada, not the USA and that his father was not a US Citizen. The crux seems to depend on your belief in the power of the legislature to confer natural-born status or the US Constitution, and of course if you want Ted to be president.
Supported giving Obama Fast Track Authority
Ted Cruz first supported Fast Track which would allow Obama (Globalist) to bypass the constitutional treaty approval requirement of 2/3rd senate vote. He even wrote an op-ed supporting this: “We strongly urge our colleagues in Congress to vote for trade-promotion authority,” Cruz stated, along with co-author Rep. Paul Ryan (Globalist), R-Wis., in a Wall Street Journal (Globalist) op-ed on April 21.
This Trade Promotion Authority, also called fast-track would allow this treaty now called an agreement to be negotiated in secret by Obama, dumped on the Senate floor with no time to read, debate or change, and passed with a simple up or down vote of only 51% to pass not the 2/3rds required by the US Constitution. This TPP treaty (masquerading as an agreement) BTW would end US Sovereignty and place this country and our constitution under the control of international corporations (Globalism). Next, Cruz does a 180 on this decision… “Cruz’s criticism of fast-track comes as a surprise, considering his public praise of the bill only two months prior.”
How could a constitutionalist like Ted ever even consider giving Obama this unconstitutional power in the first place, much less get in bed with a Globalist like Paul Ryan?
Voted to extend the Patriot Act
Where was Ted Cruz on the Audit the Fed vote? Answer: Missing in Action, nowhere to be found. However, Ted had no such problem when it came to reauthorizing the 100% Unconstitutional and and rights-destroying Patriot Act which is an anathema to anyone who values the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Deep ties to the Bush Crime Family
Neil Bush (Globalist), Jeb’s brother, joined Ted Cruz’s finance team on March 8th. Jeb Bush (Globalist) endorses Ted Cruz for Republican nomination March 22nd.
From the Daily Caller: “The Bush-Cruz connection is clear. Ted was George W.’s brain when he ran for president. A top policy adviser, Ted maneuvered for Solicitor General in Bush World but settled for a plum at the Federal Trade Commission. Ted’s a Bush man with deep ties to the political and financial establishment. Ted and wife Heidi brag about being the first “Bush marriage” – they met as Bush staffers. Cruz was an adviser on legal affairs while Heidi was an adviser on economic policy and eventually director for the Western Hemisphere on the National Security Council under Condoleezza Rice. Condi helped give us the phony war in Iraq. Heidi then went to the Bush U.S. Trade Representative as a top deputy to U.S. Trade Rep. Robert Zoellick, who wired Heidi’s membership in the Council on Foreign Relations and job at Goldman Sachs. The bailed-out bank then loaned Cruz $1 million secretly to finance his Senate race. Cruz would also borrow an undisclosed $1 million loan from Citicorp.”
