Category Archives: Politics

Banned from Facebook AND Twitter this time.

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | September 19, 2020

On September 7th, 2020 I was banned from Facebook for 30 days for the fourth time this year.   That’s a total of 120 days out of 365 days per year.  That’s about a third of the year. And add the countless pictures and posts Facebook has removed from my account and it is obvious to me Facebook does not appreciate this user’s views on a variety of topics.

I have never posted anything promoting violence or anything illegal.  I have never posted any gross pictures of violence or sexuality or anything that could be considered X-rated, yet here I am banned again from Facebook and now today I have been banned from Twitter after pointing out RBG was not some sort of hero to mourn, but rather a mass murderer of the unborn.  This is a fact.   We should be able to say these things.  We should be able to state the truth without the threat of punishment by big tech.

GOP Rep. Offers Condolences to ’30 Million Innocent Babies’ Who Died From Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Defense of Abortion

On the matter of Facebook’s fact-checkers:

“You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.” — Obi-Wan Kenobi 

I do point out Facebook’s attempts to control political narratives and misrepresent facts.  I point out that Facebook’s fact checkers aren’t fact checkers at all but political henchmen out to promote their agenda.  Facebook’s Truth Ministry is staffed by Democrat Donors and Ex-CNN Employees.

A recent example of the Grand Zuck’s diabolical agenda can be found in this astonishing quote:

 Zuckerberg: “what we and the other media need to start doing is preparing the american people that there is nothing illegitimate about this election taking additional days or weeks to make sure all the votes are counted.”

More evidence on Facebook’s egomaniacal treachery:

INVESTIGATION: 18 of 20 Facebook “independent” fact checkers have ties to political activist Soros or his foundations

Facebook’s ‘fact checkers’ are the real fake news after censoring Post story

Now, just in case you are curious,  I’m just a regular guy.  I have never been convicted of a crime, have a perfect driving record.  I am married with kids and have held down a job pretty much permanently since high school.   In short I am a law-abiding, tax-paying citizen with a perfect record, yet Facebook and now Twitter consider me some sort of riffraff to be shunned, censored and excommunicated from the two biggest social media platforms on the planet.  But why?  Their lame explanations makes no sense.  They claim I have violated some amorphous terms of service agreement when the only thing I have done is to report on well-established historical facts.  Seems my only crime is that I refuse to link my mind to their cybernetic Borg in their hive mind called “the Collective”.  I dare not stray from their well-established dogma composed of unexamined assumptions, lest I be savagely shunned and banished from their collective group-think.

Unfortunately our science community has fallen to this same collective group-think as has been proven by all the false information promulgated by our so called medical experts (See the Lancet)  in their rush to misrepresent HCQ and the media’s scheme to defame the reputations of those front-line doctors who have found this drug –along with Azithromycin and Zinc– useful if used early.

These same truth-tyrants claim to support science on a wide swath of topics, but it is obvious to anyone capable of critical thought they have no clue what science is all about.  Their version of science is settled and so cannot be debated.   These self-appointed ministers of truth are in fact zealots spreading false information that in the case of COVID-19 has undoubtedly cost many lives.   In short these lies kill.

Like most of you, I am just a poor working slob, paying my taxes, obeying the laws and raising a family the best way I can.  However, unlike Zuckerberg, I was not handed a ready-packaged DARPA company like LifeLog or Facebook paid for at taxpayers’ expense if I would carry their water.  So far Zuck is doing their bidding, but why should I and my fellow taxpayers be forced to pay for Facebook’s propaganda and disinformation while they feel free to take a dump on our face anytime they feel like it?

ClearNFO@gmail.com

END

Tucker Slams Facebook Censorship Of Chinese Virologist: “It’s Turning Us Into The Soviet Union”

Feigning Our Shock and Horror at Netflix’s ‘Cuties’

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | September 12, 2020

So we are having a big kerfuffle over the Netflix’s film ‘Cuties’ as though this is without precedent.  Au contraire!  Before ‘Cuties’ we had:

  • 1976 film: Jodie Foster plays a 12-year-old prostitute working at a 42nd Street brothel in New York, in the film ‘Taxi Driver‘
  • 1978 film: Brooke Shields ‘Pretty Baby‘- soft core child porn
  • 1980 film: Brooke Shields ‘The Blue Lagoon‘ – soft core child porn
  • 1994 film: Natalie Portman ‘Léon: The Professional‘ – Unusual relationship between Leon and Mathilda, a 12-year-old girl.
  • 1997 film ‘Lolita’ based on a 1955 novel written by Vladimir Nabokov of the same name detailing a sexual relationship between a middle-aged man and a 12-year-old girl.
  • 1999 film ‘Eyes Wide Shut’ where Leelee Sobieski played a jailbait prostitute, Milich’s daughter.

And many foreign movies push the envelope farther.

    • 1977 Italy and West Germany –  Eva Ionesco in Maladolescenza – child porn
    • 2017 Argentinian film “Desire,” which opens with a scene involving a young girl having her first orgasm.
    • 2020 Austria and Germany – ‘The Trouble With Being Born‘ 10-year-old android and her “Daddy”

Of course this list is only a small part of mainstream’s exploitation of child sexuality.   So can we at least say ‘Cuties’ sexualizing children is nothing new?  Add to this all the kiddie beauty pageants across America sexualizing kids and you can see the sexualization of children is widespread, systemic and nothing new.

And it is historic

As far back as July 1885 The Pall Mall Gazette published “The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon” written by William Thomas Stead:  a series of newspaper articles on child prostitution in England.   Stead even purchased a 13 year old girl to aid in his research.

More on ‘The Maiden Tribute’ can be found here:  On the matter of William Thomas Stead …

Wikipedia: “Prostitution of children dates to antiquity. Prepubescent boys were commonly prostituted in brothels in ancient Greece and Rome. According to Ronald Flowers, the “most beautiful and highest born Egyptian maidens were forced into prostitution…and they continued as prostitutes until their first menstruation.” Chinese and Indian children were commonly sold by their parents into prostitution. Parents in India sometimes dedicated their female children to the Hindu temples, where they became “devadasis”. Traditionally a high status in society, the devadasis were originally tasked with maintaining and cleaning the temples of the Hindu deity to which they were assigned (usually the goddess Renuka) and learning skills such as music and dancing. However, as the system evolved, their role became that of a temple prostitute, and the girls, who were “dedicated” before puberty, were required to prostitute themselves to upper-class men. The practice has since been outlawed but still exists.”

ClearNFO@gmail.com

END

The DNC Game Plan?

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | Aug 23, 2020

Unlike other governments, the Federal Government here in the USA does not and will not announce the results of the 2020 Presidential race this November.  The US Main Stream Media does and will announce the winner.  Based on past experience, many Americans will expect to find out the election results late Tuesday night on the 3rd or the next day on Wednesday the 4th.   Baring a complete blowout by Trump, this is unlikely in my opinion.

The DNC have no expectation of winning a fair election this year.  The obvious plan is to induce as much confusion as possible into the outcome so that it can be reasonably disputed.  How?  The MSM have produced polls that show Biden well ahead of Trump by double digits.  The mail in voting will cause mass confusion, recounts, etc. and provide the DNC valuable time to falsify the voting tally and to take legal action if necessary.  They have hired 100s of attorneys for this purpose already.   The goal is to drag this out until January 20th, 2021.  If they are able to do this through the court system, Amendment 20, Section 3 of the US Constitution will apply, thus denying Trump the Presidency and Pence the VP.  If Trump tries to use the military or any sort of force, Nancy Pelosi and team have been meeting in secret with the COG to plan for just such a possibility.

July 20th 2020 on MSNBC Nancy Pelosi said the following…

“The fact is whether he knows it yet or not, he will be leaving,” Pelosi told Brzezinski. “Just because he might not want to move out of the White House doesn’t mean we won’t have an inauguration ceremony to inauguration a duly elected President of the United States. And you know, I’m second in line to the presidency just last week I had my regular continuation of government briefing.”

Don’t forget Big Tech will not let another 2016 election occur again.  This is why they are stifling the pro-Trump voices on FB, Twitter, YouTube and Google.

AL GORE: If Trump Refuses to Concede, Military Will Take Him Out Of White House.

“This president is going to try to steal this election,” Biden warned in an interview on The Daily Show. “It’s my greatest concern. My single greatest concern.”

Asked whether he’s thought about what would happen if he wins but Trump decides not to leave the White House, Biden responded: “Yes I have.”

“I promise you, I’m absolutely convinced they will escort him from the White House with great dispatch,” Biden said.

US Constitution: Twentieth Amendment; Section 3:

If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act a s President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

If you haven’t heard of the Transition Integrity Project (TIP), you can check it out below…

Preventing a Disrupted Presidential Election and Transition
August 3, 2020
Executive Summary

In June 2020 the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) convened a bipartisan group of over 100 current and former senior government and campaign leaders and other experts in a series of 2020 election crisis scenario planning exercises. The results of all four table-top exercises were alarming. We assess with a high degree of likelihood that November’s elections will be marked by a chaotic legal and political landscape. We also assess that the President Trump is likely to contest the result by both legal and extra-legal means, in an attempt to hold onto power. Recent events, including the President’s own unwillingness to commit to abiding by the results of the election, the Attorney General’s embrace of the President’s groundless electoral fraud claims, and the unprecedented deployment of federal agents to put down leftwing protests, underscore the extreme lengths to which President Trump may be willing to go in order to stay in office.

AL GORE: If Trump Refuses to Concede, Military Will Take Him Out Of White House

Will COG be used to remove Trump?

ClearNFO@gmail.com

END

Will COG be used to remove Trump?

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | Aug 2, 2020

July 20th 2020 on MSNBC Nancy Pelosi said the following…

“The fact is whether he knows it yet or not, he will be leaving,” Pelosi told Brzezinski. “Just because he might not want to move out of the White House doesn’t mean we won’t have an inauguration ceremony to inauguration a duly elected President of the United States. And you know, I’m second in line to the presidency just last week I had my regular continuation of government briefing. This might interest you because I say to them, this is never going to happen, God willing it never will, but there is a process. It has nothing to do with the certain occupant of the White House doesn’t feel like moving and has to be fumigated out of there because the presidency is the presidency. It’s not geography or location so, so much for him. I wouldn’t spend so much time on it that’s a victory for him because then we’re not talking about your first, more important subject, which is, what are we going to do to stop this vicious virus that is making an assault on our health, again, our lives, our livelihood and life of our democracy.”

Even though she mispronounced the name, Pelosi’s reference to the COG (Continuity of Government) is particularly concerning.   This seems to be a deep threat by the deep state to remove Trump forcibly– perhaps their last chance.

We don’t know what the DS has planned with COG, but the COG could be used to push Trump out in Ron Fournier’s scenario below or a variation thereof.  Hopefully Trump has done an adequate job cleaning out the government to preempt a serious challenge with COG. Obviously the CIA and certain factions of the MIC are still rogue along with many other unknown actors and departments in the behemoth we call the US Federal Government.   The coup if it goes hot, could be bloody.    It does seems to me there will be some controversy over the legitimacy of the election one way or the other.  Both sides are posturing and setting the table as November 3rd approaches rapidly.

Oliver North questioned on Continuity of Govt:

Nancy’s statement on MSNBC:

(BREITBART BY Trent Baker 20 Jul 2020) Pelosi: ‘Whether He Knows It Yet or Not’ Trump Will Be Leaving the White House — Even If He ‘Has to Be Fumigated’

Wikipedia: Continuity of government

Additional related resources:

Democrats Run War Games Where They Predict They’ll Push For Secession And Civil War If Trump Wins:

The Real Reason Democrats are Pushing for Mail-In Ballots

By Brian C. Joondeph, M.D.
Running the clock out: Democrats strategy to delay and/or confuse the election results using mail-in ballots:

US Constitution: Twentieth Amendment; Section 3:

If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

Mr. Jones (2019) where are you?

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | July 4, 2020

“HITLER, STALIN AND MR JONES” Scrubbed from the internet and replaced:

Six years ago, I watched an amazing historical documentary about a man I had never heard of  named Gareth Jones.  I felt compelled to write a short piece referencing this excellent film back in October 6th 2014 to share this amazing information with others.  Since that time, I’ve updated the link a few times as this film was being removed from the net.  Today, it is nowhere to be found – at least by me.     I must wonder who would go to the trouble of removing this film and why?  It’s about very powerful people indeed like David Lloyd George, Hitler, Stalin and many others — most of whom are surly dead by now. The film’s narrative conflicts with the officially blessed historical narrative, and clearly demonstrates the double dealing and lying by the Old Gray Lady (New York Times) during Ukraine’s Holodomor (1932-33) where the NYTs was lying to its readers to cover up Stalin’s psychopathic murdering of millions in Ukrainian. This cover-up obviously made David Lloyd George and other Anglo-American establishment-types happy.  Not surprisingly, with their long pedigree of deceit,  the ‘paper of record’ continues to deceive today’s naive readers.

I’ve chased this video around the internet for years now, only to find–to the best of my ability– it has finally been scrubbed. Even the picture(s) of Jones with Hitler are missing.  I’m sure a much better internet sleuth can locate a copy in no time flat.  I’ve found residues where it was once shown at a single theater but most of what is there is file not found.

I was encouraged when I saw the new movie about Mr. Jones only to discover there is no reference to this original documentary.  Now, I have not seen the new movie, but my guess is that someone may be using this new film to recast the meaning of the original in a way more favorable to the establishment power structure.

Even IMDb has no reference that this movie ever existed:  Mr. Jones (2019)

Kyle Smith did a review of this new movie, but no mention of its source, so I asked Kyle about it. No response.

Here is NYT attempting to resurrect their sorry history concerning their cover-up of the real Mr. Jones.  What a farce.  ‘Mr. Jones’ Review: Bearing Witness to Stalin’s Evil.  In Agnieszka Holland’s historically informed drama, a Welsh journalist travels to 1933 Ukraine, then in the grip of famine.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/18/movies/mr-jones-review.html

References:

Very interesting history film about the amazing Mr. Gareth Jones; whom most people have never, ever heard of … uncovered by a happenstance discovery of a suitcase under a bed.  Like many of our truth tellers today, Mr. Jones had to be eliminated. Mr. Jones was abandoned by his hero David Lloyd George and marked for death. “HITLER, STALIN AND MR JONES”

Here’s evidence of the original from the Front-line Club:  https://www.frontlineclub.com/hitler_stalin_and_mr_jones/

Found again 10/10/2020:

Updated: Feb 4th 2023:

What ever happened to Mr. Jones? ‘Hitler, Stalin and Mr. Jones’
Hitler–Stalin-and–Mr–Jones Archived at:
https://archive.org/details/hitler.stalin.and.mr.jones_202003

Facebook Jail Again

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | June 25, 2020

Jail time: 30 day sentence to run from June 19 through July 18.

I had just gotten out of jail for another post and now I’m back in jail.  What was my crime this time?  I posted the following ‘anti-community standards’ statement on my Facebook wall:

“Remember: Democrats vote on November the 4th.”

Now, I thought this was pretty funny;  but Facebook did not.  In any event, this is the first time I have been put into Facebook Jail for something that could actually be considered ‘wrong’ by a rational person.  I guess this could be considered mean and an attempt to mislead our poor intellectually-challenged Democrats, but if they are this stupid / naive, perhaps they really shouldn’t be voting.  It did occur to me Facebook put me in jail because of a innocent typo or a date error, or maybe Facebook is discriminating against the mathematically challenged?  Is there a protected class for this group yet??? But of course I was trying to be funny and the humorless, knuckle-dragging  fascists at Facebook would have none of it.

One time I was banned for posting an historical picture of Hitler standing in front of the Eiffel tower because I had posted about a dangerous person.  You can read and see more of Facebook’s censorship in the below link by James O’Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII with Project Veritas. 

Banned Again From Facebook

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | May 03, 2020

Banned again from Facebook.  What was my crime?  I posted a picture of Taylor Swift –fully clothed—giving what appears to be a Sieg Heil salute.  I posted no comment either for or against this picture.   Now, I’m no fan of the vacuous Taylor Swift; and I’m certainly no Nazi. I have no idea of the context of this picture, but I thought the picture was amusing if not noteworthy and completely unaware this would violate Facebook’s amorphous ‘Community Standards’ flamethrower; requiring a Facebook jail term of 90 days (later reduced to 30).  The Facebook censors seem to have a particular aversion to all things Hitleresque even if from their darling Taylor Swift.

So Facebook said they were going to ban me 90 Days for posting this picture of Taylor Swift, but only banned me for 30 Days and then they said they were mistaken and lifted the ban.  But then they decided not to lift the ban, yet allowed the offending picture back on my wall.  I am still banned.  After I protested in vein, they said ‘Case Closed’ and went on about their business.  In any event, it is fully within Facebook’s power to cut me off or delete anything they want despite being founded with the help of a US Government agency paid for with my tax money.  Sweet.  I get to pay for my own abuse.

It is noteworthy to mention one of my prior Facebook infractions –which was promptly removed by Facebook– was the famous picture of Hitler (“A dangerous individual”) standing in front of the Eifel Tower in Paris, overlaid on top of a modern picture of the same spot.   I think this is really cool to juxtapose the then and the now to give a historical sense of this very spot.  Again, I supplied no comments pro or con, yet this picture was removed.  I was also banned for posting a picture of Eric Ciaramella; commonly known in Washington, DC as Adam Schiff’s personal CIA Spy a.k.a. what the media termed ‘The Whistle-Blower’.  Obviously, Facebook was trying to protect Adam Schiff’s phony-baloney impeachment effort from the curative power of sunlight.

Previous to this, I was banned for expressing my opinion abortion is in fact murder and not merely a medical procedure like having a tooth removed.  You can always count on Facebook to support the officially promulgated narrative on any topic.  It is obvious to me Facebook is tied at the hip to all the other actors engaged in the art of public deception by the speed and coordination they decide what shall be censored and what shall not. Apparently the MSM are tightly coordinated with FB, YouTube and Twitter on whatever bogus narrative is being pushed at the time.  It would be interesting to find out who is at the top of these corporations, controlling the strings of these thought-shapers.

From elementary school onward, my silly head was filled with independent ideas that might or might not harmonize with the well-established fact-claims of the establishment; or those in power over me.   I was skeptical of puffed-up stories lacking demonstrated evidence or benefit. However, many if not most, of my fellow classmates took the other approach buying into, or at a minimum, complying with the  authoritative group-think on sale at our local compulsory public school systems.    Which brings me right back to Facebook and its unending manipulation of its users.  Over the years, I’ve tolerated Facebook’s constant removal and blocking of my posts and of their knee-jerk reaction to ban me for 30 days or longer for reasons only Dolores Umbridge could love.   I cannot agree with any of their actions, not a single one.

Dolores Umbridge:  a Facebook role model?

Facebook is an absurdity; a nuisance; a gnat buzzing around my food while I try to eat in peace; or concentrate on the task at hand… always there to follow me like a shadow, and always to make sure I am thinking correctly, behaving correctly or saying the right words — they are to be tolerated until they are no longer tolerable.

I wonder how many users subject to Facebook’s constant prodding and pushing comply just to get along?

All this makes sense when we consider  Facebook’s roots.  Birthed in the bowels of the secret state through DARPA as LifeLog and paid for by American taxpayers.  Like many of our other oppressors, Facebook has an agenda; and the agenda –like the head-shot of JFK or knocking down those buildings on 9/11; or the many other crimes their soul brothers have committed — is to promulgate an official narrative in support of those they serve.   Facebook is the villain violating free speech, not me; and Facebook is burning non-conforming ideas as the Nazi’s burned books in their day.  I am hopeful therefore Facebook and their goons will soon face a similar ending.

While I’m banned on Facebook, you can find me on Twitter at @BoDogBrown or on WeGo at https://wego.social/clearnfo under David Brown.

Be the best,

David

Earlier posts on this topic:

Why does Facebook hate me?

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 15, 2019

I am not a violent person; I am not a criminal; I do not promote violence or hatred; I have never shared illegal or sexually explicit photos or paintings on my Facebook pages– ever.

So why does Facebook hate me so?

Or the question is: why have so many of my posts been banned from FB – the majority of which FB doesn’t even bother to list or show me – thus keeping me in the dark as to what my infraction was?  I am left only to guess.

Many years ago, in the beginning or my FB experience, I was permanently banned for my strong, anti-abortion postings. I wrote FB a letter and they changed the permanent ban to a 45-day ban.  From this, I became much more circumspect, sophisticated and clever in my anti-abortion posts which worked-well to avoid the Facebook censors.  From here, Facebook would delete various postings and pictures for reasons that are irrational as far as I can determine.  I’ve always thought of it as “Algorithms and/or AI gone wild.”  For example, they deleted a beautiful non-sexual classic renaissance oil painting I had hanging in my house since I was a child that depicted the side of a woman’s breast.   They deleted a picture of a pre-pubescent boy or girl (impossible to tell) in a canoe in the amazon jungle playing with a turtle — only the top of this child was bare.   Obviously the FB algorithms are looking for patches of bare skin — not knowing exactly what they are seeing.   I protested in every case and was denied in all but one.

My latest banning from Facebook occurred on 11/12/19 because as FB said I was “facilitate[ing] or coordinate[ing] crime activity likely to cause harm to people business or animals”.   What had I done that was so criminal? I posted a fully clothed picture of Adam Schiff’s CIA Spy also known as the whistle-blower Eric Ciaramella eating dinner.  I knew of several people who were banned for posting his name, so I made sure I did not post his name, just his photo.  BTW, I had several other photos on my FB page of Eric, but for some reason FB noticed this one and banned me for 30 days accusing me of being a criminal. Had they done this in public, I would have sued them for slander.

BTW: Adam Schiff previously released Eric’s unredacted name  in a deposition as did several other media outlets.

So it seems that I am not Facebook material.  FB just doesn’t want me on their site for some reason since they keep insulting me and damaging my enjoyment of their platform.

Though my tax dollars paid for their predecessor LifeLog (without which FB would have never existed), FB is now a private company and can therefore abuse my first (and 4th) amendment  rights at their will and pleasure for any reason whatsoever.    And of course the courts must determine at some point if Facebook is just a platform or if it is a publisher; or something entirely new.   Seems obvious to me that if Facebook is curating the content on their platform—and they are– they are indeed publishers.   Facebook prefers to be a platform when it is convenient to them to avoid the legal constraints of being a publisher, but clearly they are much more than a platform – In addition to abusing their users’ 1st and 4th Amendments, they also serve as an effective propaganda organ –as did the old media– for the established power structure which currently promotes the religion of globalism and all its belief systems…

The Globalists’ Creed:

  • Sustainability via UN Agenda 21, 2030 and beyond
  • Man-made global warming and carbon taxes
  • Abortion on demand for any reason at any age
  • One world governance by a singular government or power structure – preferably the existing power structure
  • All 51 to 71 gender flavors recognized by FB
  • Vaccines are safe and effective
  • Supporting and promoting the lies, obfuscation and disinformation of the Mainstream Media cabal.
  • No borders with unlimited and unregulated immigration
  • Anti-male; anti-family; anti-white; anti-Christian

The Building Blocks for their unworkable New World Order:

  1. Common Core (Control Education)
  2. UN Agenda-21 & 2030 (Control Private Property Rights)
  3. Affordable Care Act (Control Health Care)
  4. Federal Reserve (Control Money)
  5. The Patriot Act & the USA Freedom Act (Control Civil Liberties)
  6. Free Trade Agreements like TPP (Control the movement of goods, services and people)
  7. Strong Cities Network (SCN) (Global Police Force)
  8. Global Warming (Install a Global Tax of $100 trillion)
  9. CFR (Control of US Foreign Policy and Geopolitics)
  10. Vaccines (Population Control)
  11. Main Stream Media (Perception Control)
  12. Open Borders  (destroy the idea of the nation-state)
  13. NATO (destabilize targeted countries)
  14. Supreme Court (pack the Supreme Court; undermine the rule of law)
  15. Terrorism and proxy army support (ISIS, Al Qaeda, Daesh, Al-Nusra Front, Wahhabism, etc.)

Other relevant links on this site 

 

Google is Politic; and Google is YouTube.

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | November 12, 2019

Since the election of Trump, YouTube has been busy destroying the financial viability of many platforms using their services with which they disagree. All the myriad of actions have one thing in common, they reduce the money flow and eyeballs attracted by these independent platforms. This reduction in ad revenue reduces revenue not only to these independent content producers but to YouTube itself. Starting on December 10th of this year, YouTube’s new TOS will allow YouTube to completely delete any YouTube channel that it deems not financially viable. So what you have here is:

1) YouTube targeted a select set of independent content producers;
2) reduced their ability to generate income for both YouTube and the content producer;
3) and now they will be deleting these content producers because they are not financially viable.

Why would any business do something this boneheaded? Because they are not really a business in the normal sense of the word. They are a controlled adjunct of the US Federal Government’s deep state. Born of your tax dollars and used against the good US Citizens who paid the bill.

YouTube has been a subsidiary of Google since November of 2006 and of course Google was the result of a DARPA project with Stanford University in 1998.

Wikipedia: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is an agency of the United States Department of Defense responsible for the development of emerging technologies for use by the military.

On the matter of Treason

Leave a reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | June 30, 2019

Most people have a sense of what treason is, but this is based in common law, which does not apply here in the USA for treason. Why? Because most of the founders of this country were guilty of treason against King George III under common law, so they put in a special restrictive definition of treason in the US Constitution under Article Three. What this means is that it is almost impossible to convict anyone of treason in the USA: See the Opinion of Chief Justice Marshall (August 1807) Key arguments in the Burr trial.

Section 3 defines treason and its punishment. (‘Only’ and ‘levying’ are two key words here.)

Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

The Meaning of Treason: United States v. Aaron Burr