A copybook for dictators and psycho-philanthropists globally.
PROBLEM – REACTION – SOLUTION
Release an ordinary virus (because your GoF abilities suck).
Euthanise old folk and blame it on the virus.
Advise against the usual early treatment of frontline antibacterials and corticosteroids for those you cannot get away with euthanising.
Introduce a “cure” in the form of a “vaccine” which is deadly and blame it on the virus.
Slowly, allow again the use of antivirals – previously admonished as being only for animal use – in addition to the antibacterials and corticosteroids, and let the “vaccine” take the credit.
Tony Blair, Bill Clinton & Sam Bankman-Fried at FTX/Salt Conference
The Network Behind FTX: Marty Bent and Mike Krieger join Whitney to unravel the network behind the meteoric rise of Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX and what was actually going on at the company. The discussion goes far beyond the obvious fraud at FTX and looks at the networks that brought Bankman-Fried to power and were using him as a front for a dangerous agenda.
Listen to podcast here: https://rokfin.com/post/109744
Show notes: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/11/resources/show-notes/the-network-behind-ftx-with-marty-bent-and-michael-krieger/
Big Media Implodes: The Intercept And Other Media Engulfed By Scandal: FTX Was Giving Millions To Outlets Including The Intercept, ProPublica, VOX. Semafor, Vanity Fair, And More… To Control All Messaging Around Covid 19, “biosafety and pandemic prevention,” to ban certain virologists, and worse
Jefferey Sachs Blows Whistle On DoD – Damage Control Mode Engaged by WEF! Great Commentary from Dr. Kevin W. McCairn Ph.D, but unfortunately this one has been deleted from YouTube. His site is here: https://www.mccairndojo.com/ I knew to save this one. I may re-upload on BitChute or odysee at some point, but will have to edit for length (4 hrs. / 27 min). Old location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqUwXG6KogQ
Related: Breaking! NY Times: “US Created COVID-19” Out of the mouths of babes and propagandists… KEVIN BARRETT • SEPTEMBER 4, 2022 https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/breaking-ny-times-us-created-covid-19/
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on the Covid Origins Cover-Up RON UNZ • AUGUST 29, 2022
https://www.unz.com/runz/prof-jeffrey-sachs-on-the-covid-origins-cover-up/
James Corbett of the Corbett Report (Open Source Intelligence News): a well –established and dependable researcher on a wide-range of topics including history, current events and geopolitics. https://www.corbettreport.com/
Mark Kulacz of Housatonic Live: a relative newcomer yet represents the best of the best when it comes to deep and reliable research and archiving. In league with researchers like Mae Brussell. Topics include politics, history and COVID-19 https://sites.google.com/housatonicits.com/live/home
The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection. A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media:
Moon of Alabama: This site’s purpose is to discuss politics, economics, philosophy and blogger Billmon’s Whiskey Bar writings.
There has been so much great reporting and analysis on developing geopolitical events and the unraveling of the ‘COVID Project’ fraud since my last post, there is little I can contribute. Additionally, the incredible pace of geopolitical transformations makes it difficult to find time to survey, catalogue or report on these colossal shifts. I can however proffer the following podcasts for your consideration.
We now have absolute proof; the 2020 presidential election was stolen.
We now have absolute proof; Fauci lied to congress.
We now have absolute proof; the COVID vaccines are not safe.
We now have absolute proof; the COVID vaccines are not effective.
We now have absolute proof; Pfizer knew the vaccines were dangerous.
We now have absolute proof; the USA orchestrated a coup in Ukraine using neo-Nazis.
We now have absolute proof; fill in the blanks… ad infinitum…
Problem is, no one who really counts in authority gives one single fuck. In fact, they are all moving in lockstep as though these proofs of illegal and criminal activity did not even exist.
We are waiting on someone in authority to do something. All those who could do something have had plenty of time and opportunity to do something, but no one has.
Lying to congress is a crime. Where are the charges against Fauci? They don’t exist.
The CDC and FDA have been involved in the greatest crime against humanity in history. Where are the charges? Where are the orange jump suits? There are none. No one in authority gives a single fuck. They don’t, and they are moving ahead implementing their vaccine passports as though nothing has happened.
Knowing these vaccines cause serious injury, our military brass still mandated these life-altering injections into all our military; purposefully damaging our young soldiers. This is a national security risk, but no one cares.
At some point we need to stop producing even more and better evidence and expecting someone in authority to do something about it. They have not and will not. More proof and more bleating will not change their trajectory. They are moving quickly to take down this country financially and militarily and no one will stop them. Not the DOJ. Not the State Department. Not the Pentagon. Not the Supreme Court. Not the President. Not the Congress. Not the Senate.
This means the entire system is corrupt and will not protect you or me.
It is time to wake up and smell the coffee.
In the summer of 2002, after I had written an article in Esquire that the White House didn’t like about Bush’s former communications director, Karen Hughes, I had a meeting with a senior adviser to Bush. He expressed the White House’s displeasure, and then he told me something that at the time I didn’t fully comprehend – but which I now believe gets to the very heart of the Bush presidency.
The aide said that guys like me were “in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism.
He cut me off. “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality – judiciously, as you will – we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”
‘Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush’ by Ron Suskind | New York Times 2004
By now, it should be obvious our governments, media and health authorities have been lying about the COVID pandemic; and the safety and efficacy of the mRNA injections. Yet, many fail to realize this is not their first rodeo. They’ve been busy lying about much more than our health concerns; they have created a false history to justify many of the wars they have orchestrated, while their experts paint false narratives of whatever enemy they have targeted. This is no theory. This is fact.
Every major war of the 20th and 21st century was planned, orchestrated and preceded by a false flag operation to cajole the naïve public to go along with these campaigns of mass murder. After these conflicts, the paid experts and media propagandists do their clean up to make sure the narrative sticks and then taught uncritically in our compulsory public schools, universities and movie theaters.
The proof of the above is overwhelming, but few have the time, take the time or have the interest to reexamine their assumptions. The assumptions are based on ‘well-established’ facts which – as it turns out—are not facts at all.
This journey to discovering the truth can be tedious and emotionally disturbing as many of our cherished beliefs are upended. The good news is that we now have access to the research of those who have done much of the heavy lifting; but we must invest the time and effort to learn what they have uncovered, and to be suspicious of all fact-claims that can not be substantiated by evidence.
As the COVID saga continues, it is undeniable the officially promulgated numbers are confused, conflicted and unreliable. In the beginning, many of us took the official numbers at face value. The media’s narrative was and is driven primarily by the number of ‘cases’ and sometimes misattributed deaths; yet few of us know the finer details behind these frightening headlines. Seemingly, simple questions like: “What is a case?; What is a COVID death?; What is COVID pneumonia?; What does it mean to test positive if you have no symptoms and how accurate are the PCR tests amplified at 40 cycles looking only at three small segments (RdRp, S & N) of a proposed virus in silico?” Answers to these questions remain elusive, nondeterministic and subject to interpretation and manipulation.
One would think a case is a confirmed COVID infection, but this is just not so. We learn a case can be suspect, probable, or confirmed and even the confirmed cases cannot be confirmed with the formally gold standard test. The definitions of case categories represent a long and winding road of updates and links to other definitions; all subject to change at the whim of the experts. Add to this, long established definitions of key terms like vaccine, herd Immunity and pandemic have been quietly altered since COVID.
Note: with the advent of the COVID-19 project, the term vaccinated became ‘fully vaccinated’ and is now called ‘up to date’. Add to this, if you have had two doses of the mRNA injections, you are considered ‘unvaccinated’ until 14 days after your second dose; and even then you are faced with potentially unlimited booster shots every few months to maintain your up to date status; thus you are unvaccinated if you are not up to date. These moving targets can add to the already hot mess found in the faulty data collection and analysis.
Yet, we constantly hear about the incredible number of cases, while few if any know what a case is. What is a case? Ask any doctor, media pundit or health professional this question and you are likely to get a blank, confused stare. They may think you are an idiot because everyone knows what a case is, but they don’t.
We are told the CDC’s own VAERS database –designed to track adverse events– is not accurate; we have collected this information every year since 1990 for what purpose if it is unreliable?
So what are the real numbers? We will never know, but we can attempt to come up with a rough order of magnitude using the information we have to date.
Since March of 2020, I talked with many health professionals who had no idea what VAERS was; or, that they should be reporting these adverse events in the VAERS database. It takes time and effort to make even one entry, and many who know about VAERS just don’t take the time; so it is my personal opinion the adverse events are hugely underreported. But what does the latest VAERS show us? See the so called ‘Harvard’ VAERS study below. Be careful not to call it a ‘Harvard study’ lest you be attacked by a swarm of paid fact-checkers.
The Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study (sometimes called the Harvard study) does point us in the direction of under-reporting in VAERS by a factor of 100X; but even at 10X, these figures are breathtaking. If these numbers are correct, we are looking at a mass genocide of historical proportions, while our trusted experts continue to pretend these injections are ‘safe & effective’. This does not include any mid to long-term damage from this global experiment.
The CDC’s VAERS shows there have been 983,756 reports of vaccine adverse events; 34,615 permanently disabled 3,365 Miscarriages, 10,429 heart attacks and 20,622 reported deaths through December 17, 2021. Source: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
These figures may not be accurate but a comparison of previous years, may be instructive since they dwarf all other records kept since 1990:
As of December 23, 2021 we are told the total number of COVID deaths is 808,957, yet we discover most of these deaths were unnecessary: “Of the COVID-19 deaths in the U.S., none received adequate and/or early-enough treatment. At least 85% of COVID deaths were preventable.” Source: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-deaths-could-have-been-prevented/
This means 687,613 people were needlessly killed by withholding early treatment.
Additionally, we discover those who were unlucky enough to be admitted to the hospital after their lips turned blue, were given the deadly Remdesivir known to cause kidney failure which then causes their lungs to fill with fluid, so the hospitals could put them on a vent to die. This means the officially sanctioned protocol is killing most of the people, not the dreaded, scary COVID; yet the CDC and others get to report 808,957 died of COVID which is just not true.
So what are the real numbers?
To be generous, 121,343 may have died from COVID. But the question remains: Of these 121,343 how many died with COVID and how many died from COVID? How many died from some comorbidity or even as a result of an unrelated accident? We will never know.
And what is a case? There is no clear definition I can find. The more I read about the definition of a case the more murky it becomes, but I’ll let you decide.
“We are looking at a winter of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated — for themselves, their families and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm” Joe Biden December 16, 2021
“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world” – Professor Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum.
Theses are the ones not secrete, not behind closed doors.
Health experts discussed the scientific and technological prospects of an effective universal influenza vaccine. Speakers included Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Margaret Hamburg, former FDA commissioner. Panelists discussed the need for more funding for research, better collaboration between the private and government sectors, advances in technology in flu research and the goal of a universal flu vaccine.
Event 201 was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic. 15 global business, government, and public health leaders were players in the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political will, financial investment, and attention now and in the future.
Crimson Contagion was a joint exercise conducted from January to August 2019, in which numerous national, state and local, private and public organizations in the US participated, in order to test the capacity of the federal government and twelve states to respond to a severe pandemic of influenza originating in China.
The simulation, which was conducted by the Trump administration’s Department of Health and Human Services in a series of exercises that ran from January to August 2019, involved a scenario in which a group of about 30 tourists returning from China spread a novel influenza A respiratory virus in the United States, beginning in Chicago. In less than two months the virus had spread from a single index case (a 52 year-old man returning to Chicago) to infect 110 million Americans; 7.7 million patients would require hospitalization, and 586,000 people would die from the novel virus. The 70-page report issued at the conclusion of the exercise outlined the government’s limited capacity to respond to a pandemic. States experienced “multiple challenges” requesting resources from the federal government “due to a lack of standardized, well-understood, and properly executed resource request processes,” the report said. Federal agencies lacked the funds, coordination, and capacities to implement an effective response to the virus.
Clade X is a day-long pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of National Security Council–convened meetings of 10 US government leaders, played by individuals prominent in the fields of national security or epidemic response.
Drawing from actual events, Clade X identified important policy issues and preparedness challenges that could be solved with sufficient political will and attention. These issues were designed in a narrative to engage and educate the participants and the audience.
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults.
The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’ initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders.
However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a quicker post-pandemic recovery.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability.
Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them. Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish
How would world leaders manage the catastrophe of a fast-moving global epidemic of deadly disease? Atlantic Storm was a ministerial table-top exercise convened on January 14, 2005 by the Center for Biosecurity of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, the Center for Transatlantic Relations of the Johns Hopkins University, and the Transatlantic Biosecurity Network. The exercise used a fictitious scenario designed to mimic a summit of transatlantic leaders forced to respond to a bioterrorist attack. These transatlantic leaders were played by current and former officials from each country or organization represented at the table. There was an audience of observers from governments on both sides of the Atlantic as well as from the private sector, but the venue was designed to focus all attention on the summit principals and their discussions around the table.
The Dark Winter exercise, held at Andrews AFB, Washington, DC, June 22-23, 2001, portrayed a fictional scenario depicting a covert smallpox attack on US citizens. The scenario is set in 3 successive National Security Council (NSC) meetings (Segments 1, 2 and 3) that take place over a period of 14 days. Former senior government officials played the roles of NSC members responding to the evolving epidemic; representatives from the media were among the observers of these mock NSC meetings and played journalists during the scenario’s press conferences.
Softening up the terrain – Virus/pandemic movies flood the theaters 2001 – 2019:
In the summer of 2002, after I had written an article in Esquire that the White House didn’t like about Bush’s former communications director, Karen Hughes, I had a meeting with a senior adviser to Bush. He expressed the White House’s displeasure, and then he told me something that at the time I didn’t fully comprehend – but which I now believe gets to the very heart of the Bush presidency.
