Category Archives: 9/11

Was 9/11 PNAC’s “New Pearl Harbor”?

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | Jan 03, 2016

Pearl Harbor and 9/11 Memorials

What is PNAC? PNAC stands for Project for the New American Century. It was founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan in 1997 and dissolved in 2006. Interesting to note the amazing list of signatories below and that Robert Kagan’s wife Victoria Nuland is Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs at the United States Department of State. Victoria was recorded talking to U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt, on January 28, 2014 where she said “F*CK the EU“. The Mass Media generally focused on her scandalizing use of a curse word, but neglected to report on the important part of the recording where it was revealed that she and Pyatt were running the regime change in Ukraine while the Media dutifully blamed Putin’s so called aggression. If you want to listen to the entire conversation, just search on YouTube for Nuland and Pyatt or listen to the link below.

So what was PNAC? It was a Washington think tank who said that we need a ‘New Pearl Harbor’ to transform America, Rebuilding America’s Defenses; Creating Tomorrow’s Dominant Force using new technologies and operational concepts. They lamented though … that this transformation of American armed forces through “new technologies and operational concepts” was likely to be a long one, “absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”

from Wikipedia:

Of the twenty-five people who signed the PNAC’s founding statement of principles, ten went on to serve in the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush, including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz. Observers such as Irwin Stelzer and Dave Grondin have suggested that the PNAC played a key role in shaping the foreign policy of the Bush Administration, particularly in building support for the Iraq War

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was a neoconservative think tank based in Washington, D.C. that focused on United States foreign policy. It was established as a non-profit educational organization in 1997, and founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. The PNAC’s stated goal was “to promote American global leadership”. The organization stated that “American leadership is good both for America and for the world,” and sought to build support for “a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity”

Rebuilding America’s Defenses

Written before the September 11 attacks, and during political debates of the War in Iraq, a section of Rebuilding America’s Defenses entitled “Creating Tomorrow’s Dominant Force” became the subject of considerable controversy. The passage suggested that the transformation of American armed forces through “new technologies and operational concepts” was likely to be a long one, “absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” Journalist John Pilger pointed to this passage when he argued that Bush administration had used the events of September 11 as an opportunity to capitalize on long-desired plans.

from Joe Plummer: “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” report from the PNAC site circa 2004 and later posted at the link below. Anyone interested can search the PDF for “Pearl Harbor” (no quotes) to find the oft-cited admission that such an event would speed their plans along. You can also search “transcends” if you want to find out why they demonized Saddam Hussein after 9/11. (Hint: It had nothing to do with him. They wanted to project “American force” into the Gulf region regardless of whether or not he was in power.) http://tree3.com/rebuilding.pdf

Additional Information:

PEARL HARBOR: ROOSEVELT’S 9/11 False flags do not stand alone. They are better understood – and more credibly explained to skeptics – when seen in history’s context.
Ukraine crisis: Transcript of leaked Nuland-Pyatt call
PNAC’s “New Pearl Harbor”

The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline | James Perloff

Listen: Victoria Nuland Says F*CK The E.U. in Leaked Phone Call

9-11: NIST & FEMA, Accessories After the Fact

Update JFK

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts : On the So-Called “Greek Debt Crisis”

Guide to 911

1 Reply

by Joe Plummer | JoePlummer.com | July 25, 2015

Joe Plummer

Note: This essay was written between November 2005 and September 2006. New evidence has strengthened some of the original arguments and, as such, I’ve provided some updates throughout. If you’re in a hurry, I recommend you read “Part 1” and “Part 4.”

Part 1 – No Tinfoil Hat Required

For many years now, the mainstream media has played a key role in maintaining the government’s official account of 9/11. In all respects, it has done a brilliant job of filtering out everything that might undermine the government’s claims, while simultaneously demonizing anyone who dares to challenge those claims.

So let’s get right to it: Is it really baseless idiocy that drives people to question the official account of 9/11? Are the millions of Americans (including Senators, FBI agents, Doctors, Lawyers, Professors, Scientists, Engineers, etc.) all paranoid loons for suggesting we need a truly independent investigation of 9/11? The government and media would have you think so. They’d also (to help maintain that perception) need to keep you diverted from the information you’re about to read.

The truth is, for decades our government has been doing very nasty things that most Americans would never believe to be true. The truth is, the media has fed you a steady diet of meaningless news stories instead of sharing information that is vitally important to the future of this country. The truth is, if it wasn’t for the internet (which the media is now demonizing and the government is trying to get control of) most of us would have never known how badly our leaders have lied to us.

Let’s start with the main assertion:

“It is crazy to think corrupt elements within our government intentionally LET the attacks on 9/11 happen so they could be used as a pretext for war. Furthermore, it is even crazier to suggest corrupt elements might have actually facilitated the attacks.”

Now to be fair, I will admit it is utterly insane to intentionally provoke and allow an attack against one’s own country. I agree it is even more insane (and criminal) to facilitate such an attack; sacrificing innocent human beings so the “outrage” could be used as a pretext for an already-established military agenda. …Psychotic tyrants in other countries might resort to this type of “false flag” operation, but would our own government ever conspire to do the same? The answer might surprise you.

A hypothetical scenario:

Imagine if the President of the United States came on television and announced that Iraq had shot down a civilian airliner filled with American students on vacation. Imagine if there were no survivors, only grieving parents who had lost their children at the hands of a crazed and arrogant dictator. Imagine if all that remained of the plane and its crew was the frantic tape of its pilot’s final transmission: “Mayday, Mayday, we are being tailed by an Iraqi Fighter…we need help up here and fast…mayday, do you copy…” and then the sound of an explosion, screaming, then silence.

Now, imagine in the midst of the “outrage” and calls for Saddam’s head on a platter, some “idiot conspiracy theorist” stood up and said:

“It’s all a lie! Iraq is innocent of the charges against it!!! Our government was behind the whole thing! They loaded a civilian airliner with FAKE passengers, flew the plane to a secret location, unloaded the fake passengers and replaced the original plane with a remote-controlled drone that was painted up to look like the original. They then had a FAKE Iraqi Fighter Jet (it was really an American Fighter painted to LOOK LIKE an Iraqi Fighter) chase after the remote controlled drone. Then, they transmitted a FAKE “Mayday” signal from the drone just before blowing it up! It was all a set up so we could frame and attack Iraq!”

In the above hypothetical scenario, who would you be more likely to believe? The president (with the media backing him up) or the “crazy conspiracy theorist?”

Well, substitute “Iraq and Saddam” for “Cuba and Castro” and you’ve got The Northwood’s Document. The Northwood’s Document is an official United States government plan to provoke and allow attacks to be used as a pretext for invading Cuba. The plan goes further to suggest, if provocation does not work, we could “attack ourselves” and blame Cuba. It even speaks of completely fabricating an attack to be used as a pretext. President Kennedy rejected the plan just prior to being assassinated. Had he not, this plan would have led to war and the death of many thousands based on total lies. Even worse, it might have led to a nuclear exchange with Russia: millions dead, based on lies.

Here are some of the highlights from this now declassified document. I have “bolded” some words to add emphasis.

“Subject: Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba”

“As requested by Chief of Operations, Cuba Project, the Joint Chiefs of Staff are to indicate brief but precise description of pretexts which they consider would provide justification for US military intervention in Cuba.”

“It is recognized that any action which becomes pretext for US military intervention in Cuba will lead to a political decision which then would lead to military action.”

“It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner enroute from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama, or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight.

a. An aircraft at Eglin Air Force Base would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time, the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.

b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin Air Force Base where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will being transmitting on the international distress frequency a “May Day” message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to “sell” the incident.”

Other ideas suggested:

“We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba.”

“Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.”

“We could develop a Communist Cuban Terror Campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban Refugees seeking haven in the United States.”

“We could sink a boatload of Cubans enroute to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government.”

The Northwoods document (available at the National Security Archive) proves beyond any shadow of doubt that our government has openly conspired to completely MANUFACTURE a pretext for war. It also gives us an idea of how far the ruling elite are willing to go in order to deceive the American people–how far they are willing to go in order to get what they want.

Now, does this prove corrupt elements in our own government were in some way responsible for the attacks of 9/11? No, but it does irrefutably establish that it’s NOT crazy to suggest it’s possible. As a matter of fact, it proves a person must be ill-informed, delusional, or simply lying to suggest it isn’t possible.

See also: PatriotsQuestion911.com for a list Senior Military, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials; Engineers, Architects, Pilots and Professors, 911 Survivors and Family Members, all calling for a new investigation based on the currently available evidence of a cover up.)
Watch Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under three different Presidents and still works with the Defense Department, says that he is prepared to testify in front of a grand jury that a top general told him directly that 9/11 was a false flag operation.

Continue reading … (parts 2- 4)

War with Russia

1 Reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | June 27, 2015

War with Russia

While the geopolitical planners at the U.S. Pentagon make their plans for war with Russia, remember that Russia has done nothing to Americans. Remember that it is not Russia who is shredding the U.S. Constitution. It is not Russia who is trying to take your 1st, 2nd and 4th Amendments away. It is not Russia who lied about the assassination of JFK or 9/11. It is not Russia who passed the NDAA which gives the U.S. President dictatorial powers over the U.S. Citizen. It is not Russia who has lied you into spending trillions on countless wars across the globe that have brutally destroyed the lives of millions of innocent men, women and children. It is not Russia who just ceded U.S. Sovereignty to a New Authority of unelected foreign corporations through unconstitutional trade agreements which are in fact treaties requiring a 2/3rd vote in the senate. It would seem that Russia and the American citizen face the same enemy of freedom. Don’t let them lie you into yet another war. Get a clue.

Ten years ago, I thought much as many American’s do today: I believed the official propaganda about America’s list of so called enemies including Russia. After 9/11, I took the time and effort to become educated. Key to my deeper understanding was ‘The Anglo-American Establishment‘ by Carroll Quigley. If you haven’t read this marvelous book, please consider reading this well-researched and documented historical account.

Many here in America keep regurgitating the same official propaganda about Russia; confusing USSR with the Russian Federation, while at the same time totally unaware of the U.S. participation in the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 or the financial and technological assistance given to the USSR by the U.S. Many here in the ‘West’ need to step outside of the ‘Walled Garden‘ of their historical assumptions and get some actual facts. James Corbett’s interview with James Perloff would be a good first step in clearing out some of the propaganda so many of us are subject to …

James Perloff Explodes the Korean War Lies …

Show Notes: On the 65th anniversary of the beginning of the Korean War James is joined by James Perloff of jamesperloff.com to discuss his in-depth article, “The Korean War: Another Conflict that Served the Illuminati Agenda.” From deals with the Soviets to protection for the Chinese to pulled punches and “missed” opportunities, we examine how the pretext for the war was created, why it was thrown, and who was behind it.

Thomas Jefferson said:

“Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day. I really look with commiseration over the great body of my fellow citizens, who, reading newspapers, live and die in the belief that they have known something of what has been passing in the world.”(Letter to John Norvell, June 14, 1807)

Perloff’s Article on this topic…
The Korean War: Another Conflict that Served the Illuminati Agenda

SANCTIONS ARE AN ACT OF WAR:

How the scam is played…Sanctions Promote War – LewRockwell.com
How U.S. Economic Warfare Provoked Japan’s Attack on Pearl Harbor
By Robert Higgs
The Independent Institute
July 13, 2015

Memorial Day – 2015

2 Replies

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | May 25, 2015

Fort Hood has put a boot on the ground for every American life lost in Iraq and Afghanistan. A powerful memorial. Yet, another way to honor the war dead is to put a stop to all these pointless, unconstitutional wars.

If you have time to read the three well-researched and documented books by Antony C. Sutton listed here …

1) Wall Street & the Rise of Hitler; 2) Wall Street and FDR; 3) Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution: The Remarkable True Story of the American Capitalists Who Financed the Russian Communists … the self-righteous myths that tell us the USA is all about the spreading of democracy and the protecting of freedom will become an obvious, painful hoax to you. Yes, I too believed in these myths, but after the JFK assassination, the Gulf of Tonkin incident and the obvious coverup concerning the attacks on 9/11, it was finally time for me to dig in, invest some time and take a closer look at what our government was actually doing. Do I disparage our brave soldiers who fight to protect this country; who believe they are fighting for truth, justice and the American way? Not at all. I honor their well-intended sacrifices. But I am now aware of the deals made behind closed doors, as documented by Carroll Quigley (Anglo-American Establishment), Sutton and other top historians that base their research — not on official establishment propaganda– but on the facts as they find them; thereby removing the political spin and propaganda that we have all grown up believing. This is the critical point for me: If we care to regain the honorable ideals of a free and prosperous people, we must confront the evil that has infiltrated our government and surreptitiously controls the money system and therefore the government and all its machinery. This can not be done by pretending that facts are not facts. So if you choose to take this brave journey to the truth, buckle your seat-belts, it going to be a bumpy ride.

Here is just one example how our vaulted sultans of American Foreign policy honor our military:

“Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”

― Henry Kissinger

P.S. And to all my fellow patriotic citizens: Before you go about bashing my head against the wall with your fists, please read the above mentioned three books by Sutton and then we can sit down as adults and talk –not fight– about solutions and the sad predicament we all find ourselves and our beloved America in now on this May 25th, 2015 Memorial Day.

More reading on this topic here:

U.S. Soldiers Died for Empire and Hegemony
by Jacob G. Hornberger May 25, 2015

America: The Greatest Force for Good? (ClearNFO)

Is the U.S. a force for good or evil? (ClearNFO)

From Wikipedia: Memorial Day is a federal holiday in the United States for remembering the people who died while serving in the country’s armed forces. The holiday, which is observed every year on the last Monday of May, originated as Decoration Day after the American Civil War in 1868, when the Grand Army of the Republic, an organization of Union veterans — established it as a time for the nation to decorate the graves of the war dead with flowers. By the 20th century, competing Union and Confederate holiday traditions, celebrated on different days, had merged, and Memorial Day eventually extended to honor all Americans who died while in the military service. It typically marks the start of the summer vacation season, while Labor Day marks its end.

War Is A Racket (text)
By Major General Smedley Butler

War is a Racket (Video) by Smedley Butler is a famous speech denouncing the military industrial complex. This speech by two-time Congressional Medal of Honor recipient exposes war profits that benefit few at the expense of many. Throughout his distinguished career in the Marines, Smedley Darlington Butler demonstrated that true patriotism does not mean blind allegiance to government policies with which one does not agree. To Hell with war.

Eisenhower warns us of the military industrial complex.

A Small World After All: from Fannie Mae to 9/11

1 Reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | April 7, 2015

Robert Kagan (CFR)

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was founded in 1997 by William Kristol and CFR member Robert Kagan. It was disbanded in 2006. Robert Kagan is married to Victoria Nuland the current Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs at the United States Department of State. She is the one –you might recall– who was caught on the phone planning the replacement government in Kiev after the US-backed coup in Ukraine in February, 2014. The media dutifully focused all attention on Victoria’s “F**k the EU” comment and ignored the important fact that it was the USA who was behind the Ukrainian coup as this tape clearly shows.

BTW, prior to the February 2014 over-throw of the democratically elected government in Ukraine, the CIA had spent $5 billion to foment unrest in Ukraine to facilitate this putsch in Kiev. This tinkering by the Nuland gang, has cost the lives of thousands of innocent, Russian-speaking men, women and children in the Donbass area of Ukraine.

Now back to Victoria’s husband’s project called PNAC: Notice this interesting quote from PNAC prior to 9/11: “… the transformation of American armed forces through “new technologies and operational concepts” was likely to be a long one, “absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.[emphasis mine]“ Of the twenty-five people who signed the PNAC’s founding statement of principles, ten went on to serve in the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush, including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz. Notice that PNAC expresses a need for a new Pearl Harbor. The obvious question is: Was 9/11 their ‘New Pearl Harbor’?

In the November/December 1998 edition of the CFR’s magazine called Foreign Affairs, you will notice numerous references to CIA-backed Usama bin Ladin, Catastrophic Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Pearl Harbor and the World Trade Center all prior to 9/11. Prior to 9/11 all the necessary ingredients were clearly on the CFR’s radar being telegraphed or put into the pot for cooking.

In this same November/December 1998 edition there is an article entitled Catastrophic Terrorism: Tackling the New Danger by Ashton B. Carter, John Deutch, and Philip Zelikow (CFR) which is of particular interest considering this was prior to 9/11.

Philip Zelikow (CFR)

And let us not forget that Philip Zilakow (CFR) –author of the above article– was the executive director of the 9/11 Commission report who had many conflicts of interests and was caught calling the WH –which was not permitted– many times during the ‘Investigation’ and he was also caught trying to cover up these calls…and is credited with limiting the scope of the investigation.

From Rense.com: In 1998, Zelikow actually wrote Catastrophic Terrorism about imagining “the transformative event” three years before 9/11. Here are Zelikow’s 1998 words; Readers should imagine the possibilities for themselves, because the most serious constraint on current policy [nonaggression] is lack of imagination. An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America’s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and the use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either as other terrorists seek to imitate this great “success” or as the United States strikes out at those considered responsible. Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into a “before” and “after.” The effort and resources we devote to averting or containing this threat now, in the “before” period, will seem woeful, even pathetic, when compared to what will happen “after.” Our leaders will be judged negligent for not addressing catastrophic terrorism more urgently.

And let us not forget that the World Trade Center was attacked by an FBI operative in 1993 –with FBI foreknowledge and help. There is no question that the FBI was complicit in this first World Trade Center attack. The obvious question is: “Was the FBI orchestrated attack on the World Trade Center in 1993, just a trial run?”

Being well-connected … that would be Jamie … though she had no experience… she was a key player in the Fannie Mae debacle and the 9/11 report… what did she do worth $26 million?

9/11 Commission | Jamie Gorelick lower right

Jamie Gorelick, while serving in the Department of Justice under the Clinton administration, developed the policy (the “wall memo”) that prevented communication between various government law enforcement and intelligence agencies, specifically the FBI and CIA. She also is on the board of United Technologies. Gorelick’s firm has agreed to represent Prince Mohammed al Faisal in the suit by the 9/11 families. The families contend that al Faisal has legal responsibility for the 9/11 attacks.

Even though she had no previous training nor experience in finance, Gorelick was appointed Vice Chairman of Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) from 1997 to 2003. She served alongside former Clinton Administration official Franklin Raines. During that period, Fannie Mae developed a $10 billion accounting scandal.

On March 25, 2002, Business Week interviewed Gorelick about the health of Fannie Mae. Gorelick is quoted as saying, “We believe we are managed safely. We are very pleased that Moody’s gave us an A-minus in the area of bank financial strength – without a reference to the government in any way. Fannie Mae is among the handful of top-quality institutions.” One year later, Government Regulators “accused Fannie Mae of improper accounting to the tune of $9 billion in unrecorded losses”.

In an additional scandal concerning falsified financial transactions that helped the company meet earnings targets for 1998, a “manipulation” that triggered multimillion-dollar bonuses for top executives, Gorelick received $779,625.

Investigation by the OFHEO detailed in their official report on the accounting scandal in 2006 on page 66 that from 1998 to 2002 Gorelick received a total of $26,466,834.00 in income.

9/11 Revisited

1 Reply

by DAVID BROWN | CLEARNFO.com | April 3, 2015

David Brown

If you are like me, you found the conclusions of the official 9/11 Commission Report hard to believe. Why? Because it seemed implausible that two airplanes could bring down two skyscrapers in such a nice, even pattern. Reminded me of all the controlled demolition videos I had watched with amazement prior to 9/11. The 9/11 demolition was picture perfect, and something just wasn’t right. After my initial shock, I was surprised to discover that building #7 fell in just the same way, only it was never hit by a plane. I was even more shocked when I learned that most New Yorkers were unaware that building #7 wasn’t hit by a plane. I would hope that most New Yorkers know by now. There is overwhelming detailed scientific evidence –that I won’t bore you with right now– which proves the official story is not plausible. You can do your own research if you feel the need.

So here we have three buildings taken down by two planes. Reminds me of the JFK magic bullet theory, and since the US Government has a long, documented history of lying to the American public, I wasn’t buying their official story without some hard evidence. Videos were confiscated and evidence was shipped to China to be melted down; SEC records were destroyed. The US Government destroyed as much evidence as it could before any real investigation could even be suggested; and before the general population smelled a rat; and in fact NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, was the government agency assigned to investigate the building collapses participated in this government cover-up. NIST likely committed many criminal acts, though was never prosecuted …

Exposing the Criminal Cover-Up of 9/11 – Review of David Ray Griffin: The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7

I could go on and on with the physical evidence, but even without any of the physical evidence we have insider evidence from whistle-blower Sibel Edmonds in her excellent book entitled ‘Classified Woman’ that proves to me that top FBI officials were also in on the cover-up. And now we have the redacted 28 pages of the 9/11 Report that supposedly implicates Saudi Arabia though no one can give specifics since this information is part of the National Security ruse. My concern is that if the 9/11 report can’t be trusted, why can we now trust the missing 28 pages? Is this yet another layer to confound those in search for the truth?

9/11 was a pivotal event which provided the US Government vast and far-reaching, unconstitutional powers over the good citizens of America and unfortunately many of America’s vassal states have emulated this abuse of their citizen’s rights. What were once rights are now privileges to be doled-out at the whim of a new tyrannical government. It made it easy to pass the Constitution-killing ‘Patriot Act’ and NDAA authorizing the government to indefinitely detain or murder its citizens without due process; and it has opened the financial flood gates for undeclared and illegal wars across the globe. It has ushered in the police state with the help of the DHS and removed any expectation of privacy by the NSA. So who benefited from 9/11? Not the 3,000 who lost their lives or their families. Not the average American citizen. Not the US Constitution or Bill of Rights. The Government benefited with new powers and the Military-Industrial Complex benefited. Who else? Well the planners at the Pentagon who get their instructions from the likes of the CFR, RIIA, GCHQ, and the Trilateral Commission. In fact, these same folks got their dream (documented in PNAC) for a ‘New American Pearl Harbor’ to help move their agenda along quicker.

In case you haven’t seen these videos, I think you might want to take a look for yourselves…

VIDEO 1: We blew up our Pentagon with a cruise missile. We have it on video…here’s the video and a pic of the missile. The gray object above the Orange Cone on the right. The little gray object is supposed to be a 43′ high 757. It is not. Frames at 24,25, and 26 seconds…

Plane Hits The Pentagon

VIDEO 2: There is another angle from down the street at the Hilton.
NEW: 9/11 Hotel Video Released of NO PLANE hitting the Pentagon!

VIDEO 3: 9/11 – The Truth In 5 Minutes – James Corbett

VIDEO 4: Excellent film from James Corbett: 9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money
(Published Sep 11, 2015)

“Forget for one moment everything you’ve been told about September 11, 2001. 9/11 was a crime. And as with any crime, there is one overriding imperative that detectives must follow to identify the perpetrators: follow the money. This is an investigation of the 9/11 money trail.”

Until America and the world fully realize that 9/11 was an inside job, there is little hope we can turn back the tyranny and global wars that have engulfed planet earth as a result of this villainy.

Additional information at ClearNFO:
America: The Greatest Force for Good?
Michael Springmann on Visas for Terrorists
Interview with NSA Whistleblower William Binney
Classified Woman
Privacy & Surveillance / The Future of Freedom vs. The Architecture of Oppression

Michael Springmann on Visas for Terrorists

1 Reply

Please take time to listen to this important interview:

J. Michael Springmann of MichaelSpringmann.com joins us to discuss his new book, Visas for al-Qaeda: CIA Handouts that rocked the world. We discuss Springmann’s experience at the U.S. consulate in Jeddah in Saudi Arabia in the 1980s and the ongoing CIA program to illegally provide US visas for their terrorist operatives that he discovered there.

Michael Springmann on Visas for Terrorists