In today’s information war, it can be difficult to tell the difference between reality and propaganda — especially concerning matters in the grand game of geopolitics. This is manifestly true when the propaganda strokes existing beliefs widely held.
Amazingly, many otherwise intelligent, well-educated podcasters, pontificators, commentators and pundits from the alt media confirm their bias when they pick their favorite propaganda spewing from the MSM, and then promote these rumors as fact. Our friends in the alt media frequently have little to no knowledge on the particular subject, yet exhibit no restraint in echoing these false stories gathered from the same media they claim to hold in contempt.
If you care to be a bit more discerning, it might pay to seek out a counter narrative based on evidence not speculation. I present here for your review and edification the following excellent article: China Dystopia Psyop Part II | How is the sausage made?
More outstanding, insightful evidence-based articles can be found on the Main Page here: Austrian China
Note: You may think this to be a minor detail, but when accumulated over time, these psyops can and have presaged major wars; and at the least, are indicative of larger agendas that may be missed. Another psyop is currently being run against Putin and Ukraine. Your mind is the battlefield and they are softening you up.
By now, it should be obvious our governments, media and health authorities have been lying about the COVID pandemic; and the safety and efficacy of the mRNA injections. Yet, many fail to realize this is not their first rodeo. They’ve been busy lying about much more than our health concerns; they have created a false history to justify many of the wars they have orchestrated, while their experts paint false narratives of whatever enemy they have targeted. This is no theory. This is fact.
Every major war of the 20th and 21st century was planned, orchestrated and preceded by a false flag operation to cajole the naïve public to go along with these campaigns of mass murder. After these conflicts, the paid experts and media propagandists do their clean up to make sure the narrative sticks and then taught uncritically in our compulsory public schools, universities and movie theaters.
The proof of the above is overwhelming, but few have the time, take the time or have the interest to reexamine their assumptions. The assumptions are based on ‘well-established’ facts which – as it turns out—are not facts at all.
This journey to discovering the truth can be tedious and emotionally disturbing as many of our cherished beliefs are upended. The good news is that we now have access to the research of those who have done much of the heavy lifting; but we must invest the time and effort to learn what they have uncovered, and to be suspicious of all fact-claims that can not be substantiated by evidence.
In geology, catastrophism theorizes that the Earth has largely been shaped by sudden, short-lived, violent events, possibly worldwide in scope.[1] This contrasts with uniformitarianism (sometimes called gradualism), according to which slow incremental changes, such as erosion, brought about all the Earth’s geological features. The proponents of uniformitarianism held that the present was “the key to the past”, and that all geological processes (such as erosion) throughout the past resembled those that can be observed today. Since the 19th-century disputes between catastrophists and uniformitarians, a more inclusive and integrated view of geologic events has developed, in which the scientific consensus accepts that some catastrophic events occurred in the geologic past, but regards these as explicable as extreme examples of natural processes which can occur.
A geomagnetic excursion, like a geomagnetic reversal, is a significant change in the Earth’s magnetic field. Unlike reversals, an excursion is not a “permanent” re-orientation of the large-scale field, but rather represents a dramatic, typically a (geologically) short-lived change in field intensity, with a variation in pole orientation of up to 45° from the previous position.[1]
Excursion events typically only last a few thousand to a few tens of thousands of years, and often involve declines in field strength to between 0 and 20% of normal. Unlike full reversals, excursions are generally not recorded around the entire globe. This is certainly due in part to them not registering well in the sedimentary record, but it also seems likely that excursions may not typically extend through the entire global geomagnetic field.[1] There are significant exceptions, however.[a]
The cataclysmic pole shift hypothesis suggests that there have been geologically rapid shifts in the relative positions of the modern-day geographic locations of the poles and the axis of rotation of Earth, causing calamities such as floods and tectonic events.[1]
There is evidence of precession and changes in axial tilt, but this change is on much longer time-scales and does not involve relative motion of the spin axis with respect to the planet. However, in what is known as true polar wander, the solid Earth can rotate with respect to a fixed spin axis. Research shows that during the last 200 million years a total true polar wander of some 30° has occurred, but that no super-rapid shifts in Earth’s pole were found during this period.[2] A characteristic rate of true polar wander is 1° or less per million years.[3] Between approximately 790 and 810 million years ago, when the supercontinent Rodinia existed, two geologically-rapid phases of true polar wander may have occurred. In each of these, the magnetic poles of Earth shifted by approximately 55° – from a large shift in the crust.[4]
A geomagnetic reversal is a change in a planet’s magnetic field such that the positions of magnetic north and magnetic south are interchanged (not to be confused with geographic north and geographic south). The Earth’s field has alternated between periods of normal polarity, in which the predominant direction of the field was the same as the present direction, and reverse polarity, in which it was the opposite. These periods are called chrons.
Reversal occurrences are statistically random. There have been 183 reversals over the last 83 million years (on average once every ~450,000 years). The latest, the Brunhes–Matuyama reversal, occurred 780,000 years ago,[1] with widely varying estimates of how quickly it happened. Other sources estimate that the time that it takes for a reversal to complete is on average around 7,000 years for the four most recent reversals.[2] Clement (2004) suggests that this duration is dependent on latitude, with shorter durations at low latitudes, and longer durations at mid and high latitudes.[2] Although variable, the duration of a full reversal is typically between 2,000 and 12,000 years.[3]
Although there have been periods in which the field reversed globally (such as the Laschamp excursion) for several hundred years,[4] these events are classified as excursions rather than full geomagnetic reversals. Stable polarity chrons often show large, rapid directional excursions, which occur more often than reversals, and could be seen as failed reversals. During such an excursion, the field reverses in the liquid outer core, but not in the solid inner core. Diffusion in the liquid outer core is on timescales of 500 years or less, while that of the solid inner core is longer, around 3,000 years.[5]
The Laschamp or Laschamps event[note 1] was a geomagnetic excursion (a short reversal of the Earth’s magnetic field). It occurred between 42,200 and 41,500 years ago, during the end of the Last Glacial Period. It was discovered from geomagnetic anomalies found in the Laschamps lava flows in Clermont-Ferrand, France in the 1960s.[1]
The Laschamp event was the first known geomagnetic excursion and remains the most thoroughly studied among the known geomagnetic excursions.[2]
Background and effects: Since its discovery, the magnetic excursion has been demonstrated in geological archives from many parts of the world.[2] The transition from the normal field to the reversed field lasted approximately 250 years, while the magnetic field remained reversed for approximately 440 years. During the transition, Earth’s magnetic field reached a minimum of 5% of its current strength, and was at about 25% of its current strength when fully reversed. This reduction in geomagnetic field strength resulted in more cosmic rays reaching the Earth, causing greater production of the cosmogenic isotopes beryllium-10 and carbon-14, a decrease in atmospheric ozone, and changes in atmospheric circulation.[3][4]
This loss of the geomagnetic shield is claimed to have contributed to the extinction of Australian megafauna, the extinction of the Neanderthals and the appearance of cave art.[5][6][7] However, the lack of corroborating evidence of a causal link between the Laschamp event and population bottlenecks of many megafauna species, and the relatively moderate radio-isotopic changes during the event, have cast significant doubt on the real impact of the Laschamp event on global environmental changes.[8]
Because it occurred approximately 42,000 years ago, the period has been termed the Adams Event or Adams Transitional Geomagnetic Event, a tribute to science fiction writer Douglas Adams, who wrote in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy that “42” was the answer to life, the universe and everything.[9][10]
As the COVID saga continues, it is undeniable the officially promulgated numbers are confused, conflicted and unreliable. In the beginning, many of us took the official numbers at face value. The media’s narrative was and is driven primarily by the number of ‘cases’ and sometimes misattributed deaths; yet few of us know the finer details behind these frightening headlines. Seemingly, simple questions like: “What is a case?; What is a COVID death?; What is COVID pneumonia?; What does it mean to test positive if you have no symptoms and how accurate are the PCR tests amplified at 40 cycles looking only at three small segments (RdRp, S & N) of a proposed virus in silico?” Answers to these questions remain elusive, nondeterministic and subject to interpretation and manipulation.
One would think a case is a confirmed COVID infection, but this is just not so. We learn a case can be suspect, probable, or confirmed and even the confirmed cases cannot be confirmed with the formally gold standard test. The definitions of case categories represent a long and winding road of updates and links to other definitions; all subject to change at the whim of the experts. Add to this, long established definitions of key terms like vaccine, herd Immunity and pandemic have been quietly altered since COVID.
Note: with the advent of the COVID-19 project, the term vaccinated became ‘fully vaccinated’ and is now called ‘up to date’. Add to this, if you have had two doses of the mRNA injections, you are considered ‘unvaccinated’ until 14 days after your second dose; and even then you are faced with potentially unlimited booster shots every few months to maintain your up to date status; thus you are unvaccinated if you are not up to date. These moving targets can add to the already hot mess found in the faulty data collection and analysis.
Yet, we constantly hear about the incredible number of cases, while few if any know what a case is. What is a case? Ask any doctor, media pundit or health professional this question and you are likely to get a blank, confused stare. They may think you are an idiot because everyone knows what a case is, but they don’t.
We are told the CDC’s own VAERS database –designed to track adverse events– is not accurate; we have collected this information every year since 1990 for what purpose if it is unreliable?
So what are the real numbers? We will never know, but we can attempt to come up with a rough order of magnitude using the information we have to date.
Since March of 2020, I talked with many health professionals who had no idea what VAERS was; or, that they should be reporting these adverse events in the VAERS database. It takes time and effort to make even one entry, and many who know about VAERS just don’t take the time; so it is my personal opinion the adverse events are hugely underreported. But what does the latest VAERS show us? See the so called ‘Harvard’ VAERS study below. Be careful not to call it a ‘Harvard study’ lest you be attacked by a swarm of paid fact-checkers.
The Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study (sometimes called the Harvard study) does point us in the direction of under-reporting in VAERS by a factor of 100X; but even at 10X, these figures are breathtaking. If these numbers are correct, we are looking at a mass genocide of historical proportions, while our trusted experts continue to pretend these injections are ‘safe & effective’. This does not include any mid to long-term damage from this global experiment.
The CDC’s VAERS shows there have been 983,756 reports of vaccine adverse events; 34,615 permanently disabled 3,365 Miscarriages, 10,429 heart attacks and 20,622 reported deaths through December 17, 2021. Source: https://openvaers.com/covid-data
These figures may not be accurate but a comparison of previous years, may be instructive since they dwarf all other records kept since 1990:
As of December 23, 2021 we are told the total number of COVID deaths is 808,957, yet we discover most of these deaths were unnecessary: “Of the COVID-19 deaths in the U.S., none received adequate and/or early-enough treatment. At least 85% of COVID deaths were preventable.” Source: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-deaths-could-have-been-prevented/
This means 687,613 people were needlessly killed by withholding early treatment.
Additionally, we discover those who were unlucky enough to be admitted to the hospital after their lips turned blue, were given the deadly Remdesivir known to cause kidney failure which then causes their lungs to fill with fluid, so the hospitals could put them on a vent to die. This means the officially sanctioned protocol is killing most of the people, not the dreaded, scary COVID; yet the CDC and others get to report 808,957 died of COVID which is just not true.
So what are the real numbers?
To be generous, 121,343 may have died from COVID. But the question remains: Of these 121,343 how many died with COVID and how many died from COVID? How many died from some comorbidity or even as a result of an unrelated accident? We will never know.
And what is a case? There is no clear definition I can find. The more I read about the definition of a case the more murky it becomes, but I’ll let you decide.
“We are looking at a winter of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated — for themselves, their families and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm” Joe Biden December 16, 2021
“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world” – Professor Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum.
Theses are the ones not secrete, not behind closed doors.
Health experts discussed the scientific and technological prospects of an effective universal influenza vaccine. Speakers included Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Margaret Hamburg, former FDA commissioner. Panelists discussed the need for more funding for research, better collaboration between the private and government sectors, advances in technology in flu research and the goal of a universal flu vaccine.
Event 201 was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic. 15 global business, government, and public health leaders were players in the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political will, financial investment, and attention now and in the future.
Crimson Contagion was a joint exercise conducted from January to August 2019, in which numerous national, state and local, private and public organizations in the US participated, in order to test the capacity of the federal government and twelve states to respond to a severe pandemic of influenza originating in China.
The simulation, which was conducted by the Trump administration’s Department of Health and Human Services in a series of exercises that ran from January to August 2019, involved a scenario in which a group of about 30 tourists returning from China spread a novel influenza A respiratory virus in the United States, beginning in Chicago. In less than two months the virus had spread from a single index case (a 52 year-old man returning to Chicago) to infect 110 million Americans; 7.7 million patients would require hospitalization, and 586,000 people would die from the novel virus. The 70-page report issued at the conclusion of the exercise outlined the government’s limited capacity to respond to a pandemic. States experienced “multiple challenges” requesting resources from the federal government “due to a lack of standardized, well-understood, and properly executed resource request processes,” the report said. Federal agencies lacked the funds, coordination, and capacities to implement an effective response to the virus.
Clade X is a day-long pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of National Security Council–convened meetings of 10 US government leaders, played by individuals prominent in the fields of national security or epidemic response.
Drawing from actual events, Clade X identified important policy issues and preparedness challenges that could be solved with sufficient political will and attention. These issues were designed in a narrative to engage and educate the participants and the audience.
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults.
The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’ initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders.
However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a quicker post-pandemic recovery.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability.
Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them. Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish
How would world leaders manage the catastrophe of a fast-moving global epidemic of deadly disease? Atlantic Storm was a ministerial table-top exercise convened on January 14, 2005 by the Center for Biosecurity of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, the Center for Transatlantic Relations of the Johns Hopkins University, and the Transatlantic Biosecurity Network. The exercise used a fictitious scenario designed to mimic a summit of transatlantic leaders forced to respond to a bioterrorist attack. These transatlantic leaders were played by current and former officials from each country or organization represented at the table. There was an audience of observers from governments on both sides of the Atlantic as well as from the private sector, but the venue was designed to focus all attention on the summit principals and their discussions around the table.
The Dark Winter exercise, held at Andrews AFB, Washington, DC, June 22-23, 2001, portrayed a fictional scenario depicting a covert smallpox attack on US citizens. The scenario is set in 3 successive National Security Council (NSC) meetings (Segments 1, 2 and 3) that take place over a period of 14 days. Former senior government officials played the roles of NSC members responding to the evolving epidemic; representatives from the media were among the observers of these mock NSC meetings and played journalists during the scenario’s press conferences.
Softening up the terrain – Virus/pandemic movies flood the theaters 2001 – 2019:
Marshall McLuhan told us in 1964 ‘The Medium is the message’. The medium may be important, but today we are discovering the ‘Narrative is the message’ and the medium is just a much more efficient and effective delivery system for weaponized information bombs dropped non-stop on our non-critical thinkers — which today is most of us. The power of narrative has been used to convince people across the globe to take a demonstrably dangerous injection that simply does not work: “He who controls the narrative controls the world”. The power of narrative and story telling has been thoroughly examined –and proven to my satisfaction– by the late, great educator and researcher Joseph Campbell in his ‘The Power of Myth’ series.
What are some of the narratives the ‘Powers that shouldn’t be’ sell using their influence over media, experts, captured governments and our WOKE education systems?
Man is destroying mother earth (Gaia) by pollution; therefore man is bad ..
Man is destroying mother earth (Gaia) by over population; therefore we need to reduce the population ..
Man is destroying the climate by carbon emissions; therefore we need to eliminate all fossil fuels and charge a carbon tax ..
Man is consuming all the limited resources of mother earth (Gaia); therefore, we must learn to live with less ..
Nations are bad because they cause wars, therefore, we must eliminate the notion of the nation-state and replace it with a global governance which can prevent war ..
Religions are bad because they are a major source of conflicts and wars; therefore we must replace traditional religions with a new, blended version that is more tolerant and includes mother earth (Gaia) ..
White man is particularly bad because his stewardship of the modern world has led to all the bad things listed above; therefore, we must reduce the white race and promote others ..
Traditions, social norms and cultures are bad because they stand in the way of changes required to fix these global problems; therefore, we must promote those things which will destroy the family, religion, virtue and wholesomeness ..
Of course these same narratives –and more—have been carefully crafted and then injected into our culture, education systems and media with predetermined endpoints for each; designed to nudge us in a certain direction. With enough repetition and assurances from trusted authority figures and sophistry, the ‘fact-claims’ above become ‘well-established’ facts indelibly lodged in our collective subconscious. They become the stories and the myths that are immune to logic; that can not to be questioned, and thus escape any examination of the assumptions on which they were formed.
I can, and have, refuted to my satisfaction most of these narratives with logic and evidence, but few listen or take the time to understand. Logic and evidence does not sell. Stories sell.
All these proscribed endpoints or solutions to these narratives are merely the bricks and bars of a mental jail being constructed to create a bleak dystopia for all but the very special few, and a permanent loss of individual freedom for everyone else. It is time we start writing our own narratives.
Below are three excellent videos directly addressing the power of these narratives and what we can do to counter this most powerful art of story telling; which, when wielded in the wrong hands will bring about George Orwell’s prediction from Nineteen Eighty-Four:
“If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.”
The first video is from the prolific and fertile mind of James Corbett who takes on this topic from a secular view; and the second video from the truly Amazing Polly who brings it all home in a much simpler treatment with her amazingly deep, nuanced analysis which provides all of us a happy and prosperous pathway out of this nightmare trap set by those tricksters who would be our masters. The third video provides fascinating insights into the psychological mechanics of ‘Mass Formation’. Enjoy.
Francis Boyle knows his shit. Please pay attention to this solution. Memes and complaining on social media platforms are great fun, but we need real solutions in the real world that will have an impact.
Important information from Francis A. Boyle. Boyle provides real solutions that actually have a chance of working. It is obvious to any thinking person our Federal Government has been captured along with the CDC, FDA, NIH, Federal Judiciary, etc. However, our local prosecutors (district attorneys (D.A.)) and state Attorney Generals are not beholden to the Federal Government in terms of bringing independent charges against criminals (see the 10th Amendment). Thus, this is the only reasonable path to stop the insanity of the Plandemic and the Bioweapon injections that are being forced on this country. This is serious. Please take the time to become informed of this great potential solution to bring these mass murderers to justice.
Note: On the state, county, and municipal levels of government, district attorneys (D.A.) are responsible for bringing offenders charged with crimes to justice and enforcing the criminal laws. In practice, district attorneys, who prosecute the bulk of criminal cases in the United States, answer to no one. The state attorney general is the highest law enforcement officer in state government and often has the power to review complaints about unethical and illegal conduct on the part of district attorneys. But only rarely does a state attorney general discipline a county or city D.A. for prosecutorial misconduct.
Dr Mercola: Francis Boyle is a repeat guest; I’ve interviewed him twice in 2020 about the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 having been engineered in a lab. Boyle’s background includes an undergraduate degree from the University of Chicago, a juris doctor (lawyer) degree from Harvard and a Ph.D. in political science. He’s a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, and wrote the book, “Biowarfare and Terrorism.”
The Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 imposes fines and prison sentences on anyone who “knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains or possesses any biological agent, toxin or delivery system for use as a weapon”
The problem we face today is that our federal government has been captured by forces that seek to destroy the U.S. from within. As such, we cannot trust the federal judiciary to prosecute and hold those responsible for the pandemic and the toxic COVID shots accountable
To circumvent the corrupted federal judiciary, we need to focus on locally elected prosecutors instead. Depending on the state, they may go by titles such as district attorney, state attorney, prosecuting attorney or county attorney
Organize locally to find people willing, as a group, to call on your local, elected district attorney to convene a grand jury and indict the individuals suspected of being involved in the creation of SARS-CoV-2, and those responsible for the COVID shots
The charge that applies is “murder and conspiracy to commit murder.” For starters, 15 researchers listed on a key paper can be indicted, plus those who funded the research. Those to be indicted in relation to the COVID shots include the chief executive officers, chief operating officers and chief scientific officers of Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson
Also, see: CMS MANDATE ENJOINED NATION WIDE! DR. DAVID MARTIN, STEW PETERS, KAREN KINGSTON, MERCOLA!
