SSPX Schism (Point Counter Point)

Founder of the Society of St. Pius X Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, 1976.

How big is the Schism?  In relative size, not that big, but is it important?  

Has Rome been trapped in contradictions which can be traced all the way back to the Great Schism of 1054?  Are the Roman Catholics reaping the rewards of Vatican I and Vatican II?

The Great Schism officially occurred on 16 July 1054, when Pope Leo IX’s legate, Cardinal Humbert, excommunicated Patriarch Michael I Cerularius of Constantinople, splitting Christianity into the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church.  Although 1054 is the conventional date, the split was the culmination of centuries of growing tension, including disputes over the Filioque clause, papal authority, and liturgical practices.  While the mutual excommunications were nullified in 1965 by Pope Paul VI and Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagoras I, full communion between the two churches has never been restored.

Vatican I was held from 1869 to 1870, while Vatican II took place from 1962 to 1965.

  • Vatican I was convened by Pope Pius IX and formally defined the dogmas of papal infallibility and the primacy of papal jurisdiction.
  • Vatican II was called by Pope John XXIII (and concluded by his successor, Pope Paul VI) as a pastoral council aimed at updating the Church’s practices and fostering dialogue with the modern world.

What will be the eventual impact?

The SSPX claims approximately 1,500 formal members, including 751 priests and 264 seminarians, with a global following estimated between 150,000 and 600,000 people.  By contrast, There are an estimated 1.28 to 1.41 billion baptized Roman Catholics worldwide as of 2026. 

What is SSPX?

The Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) is a traditionalist Catholic organization founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, known for celebrating the Traditional Latin Mass and opposing reforms from the Second Vatican Council. Following the unauthorized consecration of four new bishops on July 1, 2026, in defiance of Pope Leo XIV, the Vatican declared the society in schism and imposed automatic excommunication on its six bishops and any lay faithful who formally adhere to the group.

Key developments include:

*   Current Status: The SSPX is now considered schismatic with invalid sacraments for confession and marriage, as previous faculties granted by Pope Francis were rescinded.

*   Excommunication: The six bishops involved incurred ‘latae sententiae’ (automatic) excommunication under Canon Law for illicit episcopal consecrations.

*   Faithful Warning: U.S. bishops and the Holy See urge Catholics not to attend SSPX Masses, labeling them an abuse of the Eucharist due to the lack of canonical jurisdiction.

*   Reconciliation: The Vatican has stated that those wishing to return to full communion will be welcomed back, though the group remains in formal rupture with the Holy See.

Jay Dyer (Orthodox Christian)

Rome, SSPX, Godlogic Zlonism & RELIGIOUS CHAOS!

Jay Dyer’s video “Rome, SSPX, Godlogic Zlonism & RELIGIOUS CHAOS!” (live-streamed July 3, 2026, on his YouTube channel) dedicates a substantial portion (roughly from ~10 minutes to over an hour) to the recent SSPX re-excommunications and their implications.

Dyer, an Eastern Orthodox Christian apologist, draws on his personal history as a former attendee of SSPX Latin Masses. He converted to Catholicism via RCIA around 2002–2003 and attended SSPX chapels for about 7–8 years (roughly until ~2007/2010). He was initially drawn by the contrast with Novus Ordo abuses (e.g., guitar or hip-hop Masses) and SSPX critiques of Vatican II. He left after theological disagreements (including over John Paul II’s canonization and Vatican II) and reports being asked to leave one chapel, with a priest (Fr. Gregory Post) threatening arrest if he returned.

Jay’s View on the SSPX

Dyer is sharply critical of the SSPX’s position, calling it inconsistent, hypocritical, and ultimately unsustainable. Key points include:

  • Unauthorized bishop consecrations: The 1988 excommunications (under John Paul II via Ecclesia Dei) and recent re-excommunications stem from Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre consecrating bishops without papal approval. The SSPX justifies this via a claimed “state of emergency” or in extremis situation. Dyer rejects this as invalid and Protestant-like, arguing it directly contradicts Vatican I’s teaching on papal authority over discipline and government (clergy and faithful must submit to Rome not only in faith and morals but also in discipline and government). The Pope is supposed to affirm/confirm every bishop.
  • Inconsistency with Vatican I and Catholic teaching: He has made this argument for nearly 20 years (since leaving the SSPX). The SSPX claims to submit to the Pope/Rome while rejecting key post-Vatican II developments and operating independently. This creates a contradiction: “Submit to Rome… and then Rome hates you and excommunicates you. You submit to Rome, you hypocrite.” Living with this daily contradiction is “a miserable life” with no peace.
  • Rejection of Vatican II and ordinary magisterium: The SSPX rejects Vatican II, but Dyer argues Catholics are bound by the ordinary magisterium (not just ex cathedra definitions), citing sources like Denzinger entries (e.g., 1683, 1698, 1722, 1792, 1830) and Canon 752, which require religious submission to papal or episcopal teachings on faith and morals even when not infallible. Rejecting this selectively mirrors errors condemned as modernist.
  • Other issues: He mentions internal SSPX scandals, divisions (some wanting fuller reconciliation with Rome), and that Rome has offered limited recognition (e.g., asking SSPX to affirm Vatican I but not fully committing to Vatican II), which he sees as insufficient or inconsistent on Rome’s part too.

Overall, Dyer portrays the SSPX as trapped in a schismatic or quasi-Protestant stance while claiming fidelity to Rome—proving the Roman system’s contradictions. Jay’s View on the Pope and Rome. Dyer views the modern papacy (post-Vatican II, including recent popes) and Rome as apostate and not the true Church. The SSPX’s troubles illustrate this broader “papal apostasy”:

  • Vatican II and its aftermath represent a departure from traditional Catholicism (liturgical changes, religious liberty/indifferentism, etc.). Popes (e.g., Francis affirming Vatican II’s liturgy as “irreversible” and magisterial) bind Catholics to these changes.
  • Rome excommunicates or marginalizes traditionalists (like the SSPX) while tolerating other errors or scandals, showing it “hates” traditionalists. “The Vatican is apostate. It’s not the true church.”
  • There is no real solution within the Roman system; the papacy itself drives the problems and religious chaos.

Overall Opinion and Context

Jay uses the SSPX situation to argue that Roman Catholicism (especially post-Vatican II) is irreparably contradictory and apostate. The SSPX’s position exposes these flaws but offers no coherent alternative within Rome. He contrasts this with Eastern Orthodoxy’s consistency on tradition, authority, and unity—implicitly (and sometimes explicitly in his broader work) presenting Orthodoxy as the better path for those seeking traditional Christianity without the contradictions. The video also covers other topics (e.g., Godlogic’s background), but the SSPX/Pope section is a detailed, experience-based critique aimed at highlighting Roman Catholic issues from an Orthodox perspective. Dyer’s tone is polemical and direct, typical of his style as a debater and apologist. This summary is based on the video’s description, metadata, and available transcript segments/excerpts. The full stream is long (~2+ hours), with the core SSPX discussion spanning a significant block.

E. Michael Jones (Roman Catholic)

EMJ Live #176 • The Vatican Obliterates the SSPX • Dr. E. Michael Jones •🕞1h 9mins

  • Michael Jones’ view on the SSPX, as presented in his July 3, 2026, episode “EMJ Live #176: The Vatican Obliterates the SSPX” (≈1 hour 9 minutes), centers on the claim that the SSPX is in schism. This stance aligns with Jones’ long-held position, most notably from his 1990s debate with the late Michael Davies (referenced in the episode’s outline via a linked debate video titled “Is the SSPX in Schism? Yes or No?”). In that debate, Jones argued affirmatively that the SSPX is in schism, while Davies defended it as not schismatic due to a “state of necessity.

Core Arguments from Jones

  • Schism due to unauthorized bishop consecrations: Jones maintains that consecrating bishops without papal approval (as Archbishop Lefebvre did in 1988, and as the SSPX appears to have done or planned in the recent 2026 context) constitutes schism. He describes schism as gravely wrong—comparable in seriousness to abortion in one debate excerpt—and rejects “state of necessity” or emergency justifications as insufficient to override canonical requirements and papal authority.
  • Rejection of SSPX’s independent stance: Even amid legitimate criticisms of post-Vatican II changes, modernism, or liturgical issues, Jones argues that one cannot justify breaking from Rome or operating in a parallel structure. Selective acceptance of magisterial teachings or defiance of papal directives on discipline (e.g., bishop appointments) places the group outside full communion.
  • Recent Vatican actions as “obliterating” the SSPX: The episode title and timing (aired shortly after reports of SSPX consecrations despite papal appeals, followed by Vatican responses) indicate Jones views the Vatican’s measures—such as warnings, potential or actual excommunications, or demands for a profession of faith explicitly accepting the Second Vatican Council, the Mass of Paul VI (Novus Ordo), and papal authority—as a decisive and proper assertion of authority. He frames these actions as effectively resolving or “obliterating” the SSPX’s irregular/schismatic status by forcing a clear choice: full submission or canonical consequences.

Broader Context in Jones’ Thought

Jones is a traditional Catholic critic of modernism, Vatican II’s implementation, and cultural/religious liberalism. However, he consistently prioritizes obedience to legitimate ecclesiastical authority and rejects schism or sedevacantism as solutions to the Church’s crises. In this episode, he likely applies this framework to current events, using the Vatican’s response to underscore that the SSPX’s path confirms schism rather than preserving tradition legitimately. The show includes standard EMJ Live elements (intro, outro with his written works, quotes, and cultural commentary), but the SSPX discussion revolves around the debate reference and the implications of recent Vatican-SSPX developments. In short, Jones sees the SSPX as schismatic for defying papal authority on key disciplinary matters, and he portrays the Vatican’s recent actions as a necessary and effective step to address that schism—hence the provocative title “The Vatican Obliterates the SSPX.” This contrasts with defenders of the SSPX who invoke necessity or view the group as operating within a broader crisis in the Church.

Compare and Contrast

Jay Dyer and E. Michael Jones both address the same recent events (the SSPX’s 2026 bishop consecrations despite papal appeals, followed by Vatican responses such as warnings, excommunications, or demands for a profession of faith accepting Vatican II, the Novus Ordo, and papal authority). They share some surface-level critiques but diverge sharply in their fundamental ecclesiology, conclusions about the SSPX, and proposed paths forward.

Similarities (Points of Agreement)

  • Criticism of SSPX’s canonical actions: Both view the SSPX’s unauthorized bishop consecrations (1988 under Lefebvre and the recent ones) as problematic violations of papal authority, specifically Vatican I’s requirements on discipline and government. They reject the SSPX’s “state of emergency/necessity” justification as insufficient.
  • Acknowledgment of Church crisis: Both recognize serious issues in post-Vatican II Catholicism (liturgical changes, modernism, etc.) and reference the 1988 excommunications as a key precedent.
  • Focus on authority and consistency: Both highlight contradictions or inconsistencies in the SSPX’s position—claiming some form of fidelity to Rome while operating independently and rejecting key teachings.
  • Timing and context: Their July 3, 2026 videos respond directly to the same news cycle involving Pope Leo XIV’s appeals and Vatican actions against the SSPX.

Key Differences (Points of Contrast)On the SSPX itself

  • Jay Dyer: Sees the SSPX as hypocritical and trapped in a miserable contradiction. They claim submission to the Pope/Rome but are excommunicated and reject Vatican II/ordinary magisterium (citing Canon 752 and Denzinger). This makes them “like Protestants.” He draws on personal experience attending SSPX Latin Masses for 7–8 years (~2003 onward) before leaving amid conflicts (including threats of arrest over canonization issues). He mentions internal scandals and divisions but frames the SSPX’s problems as symptoms of Rome’s deeper failures rather than solely the SSPX’s fault.
  • E. Michael Jones: Views the SSPX as objectively in schism. He has held this position since at least the 1990s (explicitly referenced via his debate with Michael Davies, where Jones argued “Yes, the SSPX is in schism”). Unauthorized consecrations violate Church law and papal authority; “state of necessity” does not excuse it. Schism is gravely wrong (he has compared it in seriousness to abortion in debate excerpts). He sees the SSPX’s defiance as confirming schism rather than a legitimate response to crisis.

On the Pope, Vatican, and Rome

  • Jay Dyer: Extremely negative. Post-Vatican II Rome (including recent popes) is apostate and “not the true Church.” Vatican II promotes errors (e.g., indifferentism, irreversible liturgical changes). The Vatican “hates” traditionalists, excommunicates them while tolerating other problems, and has no solution. SSPX troubles prove Rome’s apostasy. He links this to broader “religious chaos.”
  • E. Michael Jones: More affirmative of recent Vatican actions. He portrays the Vatican’s response (excommunications, demands to accept Vatican II/Novus Ordo/papal authority) as “obliterating” the SSPX—a decisive, proper exercise of authority that resolves the group’s irregular status. While critical of modernism and Vatican II’s implementation, Jones upholds papal authority and rejects schism. He does not call Rome apostate.

On Solutions and Broader Ecclesiology

  • Jay Dyer (Eastern Orthodox): The SSPX’s contradictions expose the fatal flaws of Roman Catholicism itself. There is no fix within Rome—Vatican II and subsequent developments have led to apostasy. The consistent path for traditional Christianity is Eastern Orthodoxy, which avoids these contradictions of authority and magisterium.
  • E. Michael Jones (Traditional Catholic): The solution lies in submission to legitimate papal authority. The SSPX should accept the Vatican’s terms or face the canonical consequences of schism. Upholding unity under Rome takes precedence over independent traditionalist structures, even amid legitimate grievances about the post-Vatican II Church. Jones remains firmly within Roman Catholicism.

 Summary of the Contrast

Jay Dyer uses the SSPX situation as evidence against Roman Catholicism as a whole, leveraging his personal history in the group and his Orthodox perspective to argue for leaving Rome entirely. E. Michael Jones treats the SSPX as a schismatic problem within Catholicism that the Vatican is rightly correcting through authority, consistent with his long-standing theological position (e.g., the Davies debate) and his commitment to Roman ecclesiology. In essence:

  • Jay sees both the SSPX and Rome as broken, with Orthodoxy as the answer.
  • Jones sees the SSPX as broken (schismatic) and the recent Vatican response as a needed corrective within a still-valid Roman framework.

Their backgrounds explain much of the divergence: Jay as an Orthodox convert/critic of Rome versus Jones as a traditionalist Catholic defender of papal authority against schism. Both videos reflect the heated 2026 debates over SSPX consecrations but arrive at opposing prescriptions.

THE GREAT SCHISM

Brian Berletic exposes most powerful US weapon

From the New Atlas by Brian Berletic: (Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, former US marine officer)

Lessons Learned: Today’s US Empire is using the same methods exposed by Carroll Quigley in ‘The Anglo-American Establishment’.  See Milner’s Kindergarten and the Rhodes Scholarships.

Brian provides a detailed, point by point, case study exposing the US’s most powerful geopolitical tool:  The Quiet Capture of Armenia: The Secret War the US Wages Beyond Armed Conflict (& How to Stop it)

The admitted election interference and political capture of these nations by the United States spanning the entire 21st century has changed the global geopolitical map in Washington’s favor. Yet this process still remains a poorly understood, under-reported, yet an incredibly powerful US tool in its pursuit of primacy and its “insuring no rivals develop.”

Nations like Russia and China are clearly aware of this US method of infiltrating and capturing the political, educational, cultural, and informational space of targeted nations along their respective peripheries and beyond – leading to the subsequent hijacking and transformation of these nations’ military and economic power from serving self-preservation to serving as self-destructive proxies aimed at both nations.

Both nations through government and media programs have published reports and documentaries detailing the process – but often long after US success.

Unfortunately, the state media of both nations have repeatedly failed to “get ahead” of US infiltration and subversion – often with both Russian and Chinese state media simply repeating Western media narratives depicting protests organized by the US as “pro-democracy” or “anti-corruption” movements – thus amplifying US information warfare.

Brian’s Blog: https://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2026/06/us-cements-political-capture-of-armenia.html

NEO: https://journal-neo.su/2026/06/15/us-cements-political-capture-of-armenia-as-it-advances-extending-russia-strategy/

References:

NYT – U.S. Strategy Plan Call for Insuring No Rivals Develop (1992):
https://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/08/wo…
RAND Corporation – Extending Russia (2019):
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand…
NED – Annual Report (2018):
https://www.ned.org/annual-report/201…
Guardian – US campaign behind the turmoil in Kiev (2004):
https://www.theguardian.com/world/200…
Union of Informed Citizens – Annual Report 2021:
https://uic.am/wp-content/uploads/202…
EU Neighbours East – The Armenian TV station giving people a voice and space to speak (2025):
https://euneighbourseast.eu/news/stor…
NED – Annual Report 2019, In Focus: Armenia:
https://www.ned.org/annual-report/201…
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs – ​The National Endowment for Democracy:What It Is and What It Does (2024):
https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/wjbxw…

Where to Find Brian’s Work:

Website: https://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/
Telegram: https://t.me/brianlovethailand
Twitter: / brianjberletic
Rumble (YouTube alternative): https://rumble.com/c/c-1459863

The story the media — and the government — don’t want you to hear

Sen. Ron Johnson

Read about the biggest government scandal that legacy newspapers won’t touch.

On April 29, 2026, as Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, I held a hearing and released a report titled “Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals.” There has not been a bigger government scandal during my lifetime, and yet even now that we have documented proof of corruption, most of the legacy media refuses to report on it.

My report details how in March 2021, Peter Marks — director of the FDA center that approves vaccines and is responsible for safety surveillance (CBER) — was briefed that the algorithm they were using to analyze the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) would mask or hide COVID-19 vaccine adverse event safety signals. Twenty-six days later, using an updated algorithm, senior FDA officials were shown 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, cerebral artery occlusion, basal ganglia stroke, agonal rhythm, and Bell’s palsy.

For the next three months, they received updates showing more serious safety signals. Instead of warning or informing the public, they ordered the data analyst to “cease and desist” and then lied to the American public that “they weren’t seeing safety signals” and that any adverse events were “rare and mild.” The whole point of using sophisticated algorithms to analyze VAERS is to find needles in the haystack — nonobvious potential harms that doctors and patients should be alerted to.

With the COVID-19 injections, we didn’t need sophisticated algorithms. The sheer volume of adverse event reports overwhelming VAERS was enough to trigger my oversight efforts. We faced impenetrable stonewalling until Secretary Kennedy’s commitment to radical transparency provided my Subcommittee with 11 million pages of documents. The documents make clear that FDA and CDC officials did not use an “err on the side of caution” standard to alert the public. Rather, they insisted on definitive proof of causation — a standard they knew would never be met.

They were far more concerned about not causing vaccine hesitancy than they were about informing the public of adverse events. They wanted to ensure that the injections would receive full licensure approval so that President Biden could mandate them to the military and millions of civilians, including healthy college students.

Perhaps the most egregious coercion involved healthy children who had virtually zero chance of serious harm from COVID-19. That coercion was based on another false claim that the injections would stop transmission. Some children were killed and others have been permanently disabled from the COVID-19 injections. Imagine being the parent who believed all the lies they were told and decided to have their now deceased or injured child injected.

Also in March 2021, Dr. Avindra Nath, clinical director at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), began leading a team of clinical researchers who were diagnosing and treating individuals with serious COVID-19 injection injuries. Twenty-three study participants were diagnosed and treated, then instructed to “not talk about the study” until the NIH could release its findings and conclusions. Dr. Nath maintained that early recognition and intervention were crucial for effective treatment. Yet no guidance was provided to physicians — one participant remarked that the NIH scientists had “taken the data and left us hanging.”

Adding insult to injury, in April 2021 the CDC published a report stating that similar adverse events were “anxiety” — not a problem with the shots. It was not until study participants began speaking publicly in 2022 that the NIH quietly posted its study on a preprint server that virtually no one read, leaving medical teams nationwide in the dark and the injection-injured left untreated.

We will never know the full extent of the harms (or the benefits) of the COVID-19 injections. But we do know that federal health officials were aware that serious harm was being done within months of them granting Emergency Use Authorization. We also know that those same officials turned a blind eye toward the safety signals that were screaming at them, but they refused to warn the public. The public pays federal health officials to evaluate drugs for safety and efficacy, and we have the right to be informed.

How many deaths and injuries could have been avoided had federal health officials simply done the job we paid them to do?

Currently, VAERS shows 1,676,100 cumulative worldwide adverse events and 39,099 deaths associated with the COVID-19 injection, with 9,332 (24%) of the deaths occurring within 2 days of injection. Most of these tragic adverse events occurred well after federal health officials should have informed the public about the risks they knew existed. Instead, they hid or downplayed those risks. As a result, millions were harmed after being denied their right to fully informed consent.

That’s why I consider this to be the biggest government scandal in my lifetime, and one that is crying out for full media attention and coverage.

—

The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA TODAY, and Fox Digital have all declined or ignored requests to publish this op-ed.

NBC, ABC, PBS, CNN, and MSNow have all refused to cover my report.

Read the full report here.

Source: https://x.com/SenRonJohnson/status/2067427189759332619?s=20

Joe Rogan just revealed that presidents and former presidents personally pressured Spotify to have him removed for “vaccine misinformation.” And not one of them apologized when his questions turned out to be right. He says he still can’t talk about most of it. What he will say is that the campaign was coordinated, expensive, and came from the very top. ROGAN: “They tried to crush my sponsors. They organized campaigns. There was PACs involved.” ROGAN: “I can’t even talk about it. But there was presidents involved and former presidents involved that were contacting Spotify. Trying to get me removed for vaccine misinformation.” ROGAN: “And it turned out to be right. All of it.” ROGAN: “Not a single apology from anybody. Not a single retraction, not a single mea culpa, not a single ‘we were wrong.'” The pressure failed. Joe’s audience grew. And the people who tried to silence him never had to answer for any of it…

Link:  https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/2067300993608655211?s=20

 

The Waco Tragedy

The Waco siege began on February 28, 1993 killing 76 people inside, including 25 children

The Waco siege began on February 28, 1993 killing 76 people inside, including 25 children

Speech: What You Need to Know About Waco with Scott Horton…

In 1993 the US Federal government murdered 86 men, women and children in a show of force. Since then the FBI and ATF have tried to cover their tracks by pinning the deaths on “religious extremism” and David Koresh. In this talk Scott Horton will tell you the truth about that day. Speaker: Scott Horton, Scott Horton is director of the Libertarian Institute, editorial director of Antiwar.com, host of Antiwar Radio on Pacifica, 90.7 FM KPFK in Los Angeles, California and podcasts the Scott Horton Show from ScottHorton.org.

Scott Horton Waco Documentary:

The Waco Tragedy feat. Dave Hardy, Dan Gifford, James Tabor, Paul Fatta, David Thibodeau, Jim Bovard, Barbara Grant, Mike McNulty

Scott Horton has produced and hosted extensive coverage of the 1993 Waco tragedy, most notably a 13-hour special production titled “The Waco Tragedy” released for the 30th anniversary, which features interviews with survivors, experts, and journalists. This comprehensive project includes discussions on infrared footage analysis, the ATF raid, the 51-day siege, and the April 19 fire, challenging the official government narrative.

Key documentaries and segments featured in his work include:

Waco: The Rules of Engagement: A seminal film by Dan Gifford that scrutinizes the forward-looking infrared (FLIR) footage, which Horton has repeatedly highlighted to question the government’s account of the final day.

Waco: A New Revelation: A follow-up film that presents a cleaner copy of the infrared footage, suggesting flashes were gunfire rather than solar reflections, a point further analyzed by engineer **Barbara Grant**.

When the Government Lied: Waco’s Infrared Deception: A documentary by Barbara Grant that uses her expertise in radiometry to argue that federal agents fired on Branch Davidians during the siege’s final moments.

Horton’s interviews with figures such as David Thibodeau (a surviving Branch Davidian), Jim Bovard, Dan Gifford, David Hardy, and Barbara Grant provide a detailed alternative perspective on the events, covering the Branch Davidians’ theology, the FBI’s tank and gas attacks, and subsequent cover-ups. These resources are available on scotthorton.org and YouTube, often serving as primary sources for those investigating the incident beyond mainstream media accounts.

Christian Secor on The American Regime

Christian Secor on The American Regime
by Our Interesting Times

EPISODE DESCRIPTION
Christian Secor joins Our Interesting Times to discuss his book The American Regime, now in its second edition. Originally written anonymously from prison following the events of January 6th, the book offers a provocative analysis of power, oppression, and the nature of the modern American political order.

The American Regime by Christian Secor, 2nd Edition:

The American Regime by Christian Secor, 2nd Edition

Christian Secor: This book is dedicated to all the patriot dissidents held as political prisoners or otherwise repressed by the satanic regime which has seized power in the United States, but most especially the following:

ASHLEY BABBITT, an Airforce veteran who was shot in the neck, though she was unarmed, and whose murderer remains at large.

JOHN ANDERSON, a Marine Corps veteran murdered in prison by the state while being held indefinitely and illegally on fake charges. His murderers remain at large.

ROSANNE BOYLAND, who was beaten to death by Capitol Police, and whose murderer remains at large.

BENJAMIN PHILLIPS, hit on the head with a flashbang grenade. The police refused to help him while his heart had stopped. His murderer remains at large.

KEVIN GREESON, also killed by a flashbang grenade to the skull. The police refused to resuscitate him. His murderer remains at large.

MATTHEW PERNA, driven to suicide by the media and state because he trespassed in the “people’s house.”

To the prisoners and exiles of the RISE ABOVE MOVEMENT, whose only crime was to defend peaceful MAGA demonstrators from Antifa.

These are only a few. The regime’s many illegal acts of state terror are so numerous that they are difficult to count, but not a single one will be forgotten or unaccounted for.

I am proud of what I did. May these enemies of the people suffer many times what they have inflicted.

They will not replace us.

U.S. military’s first strike against Iran on 28 February 2026

The U.S. military’s first strike against Iran on 28 February 2026 killed between 175 and 180 people, most of them schoolgirls aged 7 to 12, in a missile attack on the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Minab, southern Iran. The strike, part of Operation Epic Fury, involved multiple missile hits, including a “triple tap,” and occurred while students were still on school grounds despite early efforts to evacuate.

“My name is Josephine Gilboa. I’m a former intelligence officer. I served 17 years in the US military. A modern Tomahawk missile is equipped with built-in cameras. Satellite imagery is continuously collected by multiple intelligence agencies and countries. Instantly, the entire school was surrounded by colorful children’s drawings, flowers, and vibrant wall murals. From satellite imagery, there was no doubt it was a school. At 10:00 a.m., Israel and the United States began attacking Iran. At 10:20 a.m., Minneapolis School staff were evacuating the children. The first strike hit the school. The children moved to the prayer room. The second strike also hit the prayer room. 163 children were killed. To ensure the accuracy of US Navy and military operations and to minimize errors, intelligence reports from multiple sources, regional sources, and US officials are required. That’s how it works. We bombed a school, and we knew it was a school. Who are the terrorists? Who are the bad guys in this story? This is our version of the story according to our definition of terrorism. And as a former counterterrorism officer, I can say this: We are the terrorists, we are the bad guys.”

Source: https://x.com/gokhansasi/status/2044741059389878618?s=20

The War against China – connecting the dots

US War on China | Energy Blockade on China

By Brian Berletic

US/IRAN/China NEW VIDEO: US War on Iran & the Wider Dirty War on China: US/Ukrainian Mercenaries In Myanmar

X / Twitter: (Video)
Rumble: (Video)

Summary: 
– While the US attack on Iran throttles energy production and exports to China, following the cutting of energy exports from Venezuela to China in a war earlier this year, and years of attacking Russian energy production via Ukraine, US-backed militants in Myanmar are attacking pipelines leading directly into China;

– A US citizen and several Ukrainians were caught bringing in large numbers of combat drones to fight the central Myanmar government and attack key infrastructure across the country including Belt and Road Initiative projects;

– Zooming out from any one of these conflicts reveals a global US war and proxy war as well as a developing global oil blockade against China;

References:

  • NEO – American/Ukrainians Caught Arming Militants in Myanmar and the US Dirty War on China (Mar. 20, 2026): https://journal-neo.su/2026/03/20/american-ukrainians-caught-arming-militants-in-myanmar-and-the-us-dirty-war-on-china/
  • The Indian Express – NIA arrests six Ukrainians, one from US for plotting terror activities in India (Mar. 17, 2026): https://indianexpress.com/article/india/nia-arrests-six-ukrainians-one-from-us-for-plotting-terror-activities-in-india-10585555/
  • Reuters – Ukraine seeks release of citizens arrested in India over alleged Myanmar drone activity (Mar. 18, 2026): https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/ukraine-seeks-release-citizens-arrested-india-over-alleged-myanmar-drone-2026-03-18/#:~:text=By%20Krishna%20N.,Sign%20up%20here.
  • CNBC – Who is Matthew VanDyke? NIA arrests US citizen and six Ukrainians for links with anti-India insurgent groups (Mar. 19, 2026): https://www.cnbctv18.com/india/nia-arrests-us-citizen-matthew-aaron-vandyke-six-ukrainians-anti-india-drone-warfare-training-network-in-myanmar-ws-l-19871344.htm
  • Newsweek – Meet Matthew VanDyke, Former U.S. POW Training Ukrainians to Fight Russia (Apr. 2022): https://www.newsweek.com/meet-former-u-s-pow-training-ukrainians-fight-russia-1699373

US-Backed Militants and Opposition in Myanmar

  • The New Atlas – Myanmar: US-backed Fronts Behind War, Blocking Development – starts at around 1 minute, 30 seconds (2021):
    https://youtu.be/7ReeqgDlHmk?si=TIPbp5XRRSVl8Utr&t=91
  • Wikileaks – THAILAND: ALLEGED USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS ALONG THAI BORDER:
    https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/05BANGKOK3930_a.html
  • Wikileaks – SNAPSHOT OF NORTHERN KAREN STATE PROVIDES LITTLE HOPE:
    https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08CHIANGMAI32_a.html
  • Wikileaks – FREE BURMA RANGERS: PROVIDING HUMANITARIAN RELIEF; NOT ARMING
  • INSURGENTS: https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/07CHIANGMAI188_a.html
  • Wikileaks – KAREN GROUPS SAY FIGHTING WON’T REACH REFUGEE CAMPS IN THAILAND:
    https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/07CHIANGMAI70_a.html
  • Wikileaks – MILITARY DETENTION OF AMCIT UNDERSCORES SHIFT IN THAI POLICY TOWARD BURMA: https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08CHIANGMAI69_a.html
  • The World – Myanmar Elections: A Changing Country and its Exiled Opponents (2013):
    https://web.archive.org/web/20250120151946/https://theworld.org/stories/2013/08/15/myanmar-elections-changing-country-and-its-exiled-opponents
  • US NED – Burma (Myanmar) (2020):  https://web.archive.org/web/20210314232434/https://www.ned.org/region/asia/burma-2020/
  • VOA – Myanmar Shadow Civilian Government Opens Office in Washington (2022): https://www.voanews.com/a/myanmar-shadow-civilian-government-opens-office-in-washington-/6840870.html
  • NUG “Ministry of Foreign Affairs” – Zin Mar Aung: https://mofa.nugmyanmar.org/h-e-daw-zin-mar-aung/
  • US NED – Ms. Zin Mar Aung:
    https://web.archive.org/web/20201202195214/https://www.ned.org/fellows/ms-zin-mar-aung/
  • US State Department – International Women of Courage Award Winners 2012:
    https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/gwi/iwoc/2012/bio/index.htm
  • The New Atlas – Washington’s, Not Myanmar’s “National Unity Government” (2021):
    https://youtu.be/AqoM5JwnQcI?si=sMdbz_sZivTov7Bl

A Maritime Oil Blockade On China

  • US Naval War College Review – A Maritime Oil Blockade Against China—Tactically Tempting but Strategically Flawed (2018): https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1735&context=nwc-review
  • NYT – The Separation (Dec. 30, 2025): https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/12/30/world/europe/ukraine-war-us-russia.html

Where to Find Brian’s Work:

  • Website: https://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/
  • Telegram: https://t.me/brianlovethailand
  • Twitter: https://twitter.com/BrianJBerletic
  • Rumble (YouTube alternative): https://rumble.com/c/c-1459863

How to Support Brian:

  • Buy Brian A Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/TheNewAtlas
  • Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/landdestroyer
  • PromptPay: 0851547235

Related:

This is the REAL Endgame in Iran by James Corbett

Update Iran

Can Israel & the U.S. Sustain Iran’s Military Power? (w/ Alastair Crooke) | The Chris Hedges Report (March 7, 2026)

  • Iran’s superior preparation and missile strategy enable prolonged attrition warfare: Iran maintains vast decentralized stocks of missiles (including advanced hypersonics held in reserve), buried silos with autonomous “dead hand” firing capabilities across multiple districts, and uses older systems to exhaust Israeli/U.S. interceptors before escalating, making a long war sustainable for Iran while depleting attackers’ defenses.
  • The conflict has already inflicted significant strategic losses on Israel and the U.S.: Israeli interceptor missiles are being rapidly depleted, billion-dollar U.S. radar systems destroyed, and intelligence capabilities crippled; this reflects impulsive escalation driven by hubris, with shifting pretexts from nuclear threats to missile destruction and regime change.
  • Iran leverages regional Shia mobilization and symbolic acts for broader escalation: The killing of key figures (including the Supreme Leader) has sparked Shia solidarity, uprisings (e.g., in Bahrain), attacks on U.S. assets, and fatwas for jihad, turning the war into a wider sectarian/regional struggle that spreads beyond Iran’s borders and complicates U.S./Israeli objectives.
  • Control of the Strait of Hormuz gives Iran decisive economic leverage: Iran can threaten or close the strait (via mines, missiles, and coastal artillery), endangering global oil/LNG flows (~20-30% of world supply), pressuring energy markets, weakening the dollar, exposing Europe’s vulnerability, and shifting Gulf power dynamics toward Iran while making sustained U.S. naval operations risky or unsustainable.
  • U.S. and Israel face unsustainable overreach with no clear path to victory: The war—pushed by Netanyahu’s influence on Trump—lacks contingency plans for energy crises, long-term attrition, heavy civilian casualties (e.g., bombed schools), internal Israeli fractures, or political backlash at home; Iran “wins by surviving,” potentially forcing de-escalation on its terms (sanctions relief, troop withdrawal) amid regional blowback and economic fallout.

Also… 

(May 26, 2026) GLOBAL ECONOMY WILL ONLY GET WORSE DUE TO IRAN WAR – w/ Analyst Alex Krainer

 

How Epstein Hijacked Bitcoin with Aaron Day

How Epstein Hijacked Bitcoin with Aaron Day by Corbett | Feb 27, 2026 | (Video)

From the hijacking of bitcoin to the passing of the GENIUS Act, a deep dive in the Epstein files reveals Epstein’s fingerprints are all over the transformation of the global economy and our digital currency enslavement. Aaron Day joins us today to discuss “The Hijacking of Bitcoin,” his detailed and well-documented breakdown of how and why Epstein hijacked bitcoin.

The Hijacking of Bitcoin (article)

A forensic investigation on the major movers and shakers of the cryptocurrency industry that explores the people, businesses, investments, patents, and infrastructure behind the blockchain and the oncoming new financial system.  The Chain.

 

JAKEGTV @JakeG_Official 12 minutes on stage at Anarchapulco. Full, unedited speech.

The Epstein Money Trail Finally Exposed | Harley Schlanger

Rockefeller Medicine vs. Jack Kruse

Dr Jack Kruse:

Look for 15 years I have tried to educate you.  THIS IS THE LAST TIME.  So pay attention.   Your Rockefeller education beliefs are all FALSE.

When dueterium leakage occurs  into the matrix it stimulates cataplerosis in the TCA  and the M1 Phenotype results.  This process leads directly to the CDR too because tunneling speeds are destroyed.  Here is where you, Peter D and your Rockefeller education screwed you.  You know shit about tunneling speeds.

Quantum mechanics tells us according to the formula for tunneling, even a tiny increase in distance (measured in angstroms) leads to an exponential drop in energy efficiency and a massive spike in ROS = massive non coherent UPEs that are the hallmark of disease generation.  this is why I showed you Picard picture on the change in IMJ geometry.  When the IMJs change you know tunneling speeds have cratered.  Deuterium’s KIE is a massive problem for tunneling speeds.  But you and your food guru friends have no idea why.

Quantum tunneling is extremely sensitive to mass.  Deuteriumhas double the mass of H+.

In the quantum world, as scale shrinks the effects become logrithmic because of the inverse square law.  This means the effect of deuterium is off the chart.   The doubling the mass of the particle attempting to “tunnel” across a gap doesn’t just slow it down, it makes the probability of a successful tunnel drop exponentially.  This is not subject to your beliefs or your experts beliefs because these UNIVERSAL laws in physics true on Earth or another galaxy.

The Result: Electrons and protons “stutter.” This delay increases the “dwell time” of electrons on the respiratory chain, leading to their premature escape and the creation of Superoxide.  This is a ROS.  ROS makes UPEs.  You have no clue what a UPE even is because you’re a food guru.  It is a biophoton.

The ATP synthase, (FoF1), is a physical motor that spins at speeds up to 9,000 RPM. It is designed specifically for the “light” weight of a single proton.

The “Wobble” Effect: When a deuterium atom enters the top of the motor, the extra mass creates a mechanical imbalance, much like a lead weight on a high-speed fan blade.

The Breakdown: This “wobble” creates friction and heat, physically damaging the mitochondrial inner membrane and causing leakage of the proton gradient. This leakage is a primary signal that triggers CDR1, as the cell perceives a loss of “pressure” (voltage) and shifts into defense mode.

Deuterium in the matrix then causes the 25(OH)D Crash.  Remember the VDR sits on the IMM as a brake for unfettered ROS/RNS production.  Mitochondria rely on metabolic water production at CCO which is deuterium depleted.  It is a highly structured, liquid-crystalline state of H2O.  This type of water excludes solutes and anything over the size of a H+.  This includes isotopes like deuterium which are double the size/mass of H+.

When any stressor hits the system, say like nnEMF light stress, nnEMF shrinks the EZ water layer through CCO dehydration . When this layer collapses, deuterium “leaks” into the matrix and the enzymes and causes the destruction.

As deuterium replaces protium in the water shells surrounding the CYP450 enzymes, the vibrational frequency of the enzyme changes. The enzyme loses its “quantum tune.”  To compensate for the loss of mitochondrial efficiency caused by deuterium “pollution,” the body consumes Vitamin D at a massive rate to try and dampen the resulting ROS and stabilize the membrane.

Once deuterium pollutes the matrix:

OXPHOS fails: The motors are broken.

Cataplerosis is unleashed: The cell stops trying to make ATP and starts dumping TCA intermediates (like citrate) to create lipids for new membranes (to replace the damaged ones).

UPEs spike: The “friction” from deuterium in the nanomotors releases incoherent photons (UPEs), signaling to neighboring cells that the environment is toxic.

The unleashing cataplerosis should make you realize why the M1 (Pro-inflammatory) Phenotype is always the result:

Because the TCA cycle breaks at two SPECIFIC places (at Isocitrate Dehydrogenase and Succinate Dehydrogenase).

This causes a massive efflux (cataplerosis) of Citrate and Succinate into the cytosol.

Succinate then acts as a potent inflammatory signal, stabilizing HIF-1α and further shutting down oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS).

In this state, the mitochondria stop making “energy and hormones” and start making “defense signals and ROS.”  the ROS makes non coherent UPEs and this causes all the diseases of man.  You do not know this because you do not read shit about biophotons.  Van Wijk and Popp have written careers on it while you wasted your time with your Rockefeller biochemistr retard PhD who knows none of this.   This explains why our Vitamin D receptor sits on the IMM because it is a key regulator of this entire process. Melanin sits on the skin in cholesterol rafts capturing UVB light to stop this process.  That is why the SUN heals it all and most of your bullshit beliefs are all linked back to Rockefeller solutions in centralized biochemistry and BigHarma.  The VDR on our IMM  trys to act as a “circuit breaker” for the CDR tied to deuterium effects in the matrix.

The “Sinister” Element of deuterium is an expansion of Mitochondrial Heteroplasmy = disease.  See Doug Wallace.  LEARN.

ANY increase in heteroplasmy = mitochondrial DNA damage.

nnEMF increases the distance between respiratory proteins on the inner mitochondrial membrane.

This slows down Electron Tunneling Speed (e).

According to the formula for tunneling, even a tiny increase in distance (measured in angstroms) leads to an exponential drop in energy efficiency and a massive spike in ROS = massive non coherent UPEs that are the hallmark of disease generation.

In metabolic terms, cataplerosis is the process of “draining” or siphoning intermediates out of the Tricarboxylic Acid (TCA) cycle.

Here is what that “unleashing” looks like in the body:

Siphoning for Survival (Biosynthesis): Instead of intermediates completing the full cycle to generate ATP, they are exported to create essential building blocks. This happens in cancers.

Citrate is pulled for fatty acid synthesis.

Alpha-ketoglutarate is drained to make amino acids or neurotransmitters.

Oxaloacetate is diverted toward gluconeogenesis to maintain blood sugar. This is why nnEMF raises blood sugar in stress response.

Preventing “Clogging”: Cataplerosis acts as a pressure-relief valve. If intermediates (anions) accumulate too heavily in the mitochondria, it can disrupt cellular function. Unleashing this process clears out the “sink” so the cycle can continue to process incoming fuel.

The Cost of “Unleashing”: Because the TCA cycle is a closed loop, removing these “rungs of the ladder” will eventually break the cycle unless they are replaced by a counter-process called anaplerosis (refilling the cycle).

Environmental Link: In your specific context, light stress from a move and heavy nnEMF is unleashing cataplerosis might be the body’s way of prioritizing oxidative repair or calcium buffering over standard energy production. It’s a “emergency mode” where the body spends its metabolic currency (like Vitamin D and TCA intermediates) to fix immediate damage. It really tells you how bad the place you went to was.

In short: it is your metabolism switching from “maintenance mode” to “construction/repair mode” because your body is sensing a cell danger response.  What I am saying to you , is that your body “used what it needed in this moment,” but it left a collateral wake in your system. What are the system collateral effects? I am likely describing a massive decoupling event at the Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) level.  why?  When Fe in in its +3 state it cannot bind oxygen and P450 cannot make hormones = pregnenlone steal syndrome.

Hormone synthesis from cholesterol relies on the CYP450 (Cytochrome P450) family of enzymes, which are heme-containing proteins.

The Power of Heme: Heme is the “business end” of these enzymes, acting as a specialized scaffold for electron transfer. To function, it requires precise quantum coherence, which is the ability of electrons to “tunnel” and move in a wave-like, coordinated state.

UPE Disruption: Non-native EMFs (nnEMF) act as electromagnetic “noise” that disrupts this coherence. This triggers the production of non-coherent Ultra-weak Photon Emissions (UPEs).

ROS and Heme Damage: The resulting flood of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) from the mitochondria (the “danger mode” or CDR1) is highly toxic to “free” or loosely bound heme. When the heme center of a CYP enzyme is damaged or its electron flow is decoupled by ROS, the enzyme can no longer convert cholesterol into pregnenolone (the “mother hormone”), effectively halting the entire steroidogenic pathway at the source.

If the environmental signals (like high milligauss levels from nnEMF) are constantly triggering the CDR, the mitochondria stay stuck in a pro-inflammatory state (M1 phenotype) designed for defense, not repair. the M1 state is caused by non-coherent UPE signaling. This is why high nnEMF environments are deadly when you blow away your P450 system.

True photorepair healing requires moving from CDR1 (defense) to CDR2 (growth) and finally CDR3 (differentiation and restoration). A “toxic” environment, one with high nnEMF, poor light cycles, or chemical stress, acts as a persistent “block” that keeps cells from completing this cycle.

Mitochondrial Mosaics: Over time, staying in the same environment creates a “mosaic” of dysfunctional cells that have failed to complete the healing cycle, leading to chronic illness or reigniting the flame of disease.

Lesson Over.

Source: https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/2026295084182843403?s=20

Neurosurgeon @DrJackKruse:

  • Twitter/X (https://x.com/DrJackKruse)
  • http://patreon.com/drjackkruse
  • www.kruseatdestin.com
  • jackkruse.com

For more context see:  Electron Transport Chain – ATP Synthase, Chemiosmosis, & Oxidative Phosphorylation (video)

Good printout on how to mitigate nnEMF: 100+ EMF Hacks (pdf)

What is Rockefeller Medicine?  Rockefeller Medicine by James Corbett (video)

More from Jack Kruse… The War on Sunlight Is Real (And It’s Not an Accident) | Dr. Jack Kruse